Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> Mr Nuel Henderson <br /> • Page 7 of 9 <br /> I 1 <br /> ' QUARTERLY FIELDWORK <br /> Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling <br /> tDepth to groundwater was measured on February 19, 2003 in monitoring wells MW 1 through <br /> MW16B and in vapor wells VWl through VW6 Depth to groundwater was then subtracted from <br /> each respective wellhead elevation to determine groundwater elevation Water levels at the site rose <br /> an average of approximately 0 53 feet since November 13, 2002 <br /> ' Groundwater flowed in a northeasterly direction, and the average gradient across the site was <br /> approximately 0 002 feet per foot A potentiometric surface map generated using the groundwater <br /> elevation data from all site monitoring wells is shown on Figure 2 Water level data are summarized <br /> ' in Table 2 Monitoring data sheets and well construction details are included in Attachment D <br /> On February 20 and 21, 2003, a Ground Zero technician collected groundwater samples from <br /> monitoring wells MW1 through MW5, MW7 through MW9, MW12 through MW16B and from <br /> ' vapor wellsVW 1 and VW3 A minimum of three well casing volumes was purged from each well <br /> prior to sampling During the purging process, physical parameters (pH, electrical conductivity, and <br /> temperature) were monitored Subsequent to parameter stabilization, and a minimum of 80% <br /> ' recovery of initial depth to groundwater measurements, groundwater samples were collected and <br /> placed in an iced cooler for transport to Argon Laboratories (FLAP #2359) under chain of custody <br /> protocol Purge logs are included in Attachment D <br /> ' <br /> Analysis consisted of gasoline oxygenates, EDB and 1,2-DCA by EPA Method 8260, TPHg by EPA <br /> Y g Yg <br /> Method 8015 modified and BTEX by EPA Method 8020 Purge water was transferred into labeled <br /> ' 55-gallon drums approved by the Department of Transportation (DOT), which are stored onsite <br /> within a secured area <br /> ' Groundwater Analytical Results <br /> Groundwater Monitonng Wells <br /> ' Dissolved TPHg and BTEX concentrations in the monitoring wells were within histoncal ranges, <br /> and appear to be stable to decreasing In the new downgradient well series MW15A, Band C, <br /> TPHg was detected only in MW15B and BTEX were not detected in any of the wells TPHg and <br /> BTEX concentration data are summarized in Table 4 Attachment E contains laboratory reports <br /> and chain of custody documentation <br /> ' MTBE was detected in wells MW3 (41,000ppb), MW4 (5,300 ppb), MW7 (110 ppb), MW9 (5 1 <br /> ppb), MW 12 (78 ppb), MW 14 (110,000 ppb), MW 15A (59 ppb), MW 15B (86 ppb), MW 16A <br /> (2,900 ppb) and MW 16B (260 ppb) TBA was detected at a level of 66 ppb in the sample from <br /> well MW2 � <br /> �I <br /> ' \1GZA_FS\VOL_]\DATA\GROlTNM=OEKICLOSURE1Re;*M\Add_HSA Mud wells doc <br />