Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Nuel Henderson <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> The potentiometric surface was above the top of the screened intervals in monitoring wells <br /> MW4 through MW13B, MW15B, MW15C, MW16B and vapor wells VW1 and VW4. Vapor <br /> well VW5 was dry. Groundwater flowed in an east-northeasterly direction. The gradient <br /> across the site was approximately 0.002 feet per foot. A potentiometric surface map generated <br /> using the groundwater elevation data from all site groundwater monitoring wells is shown on <br /> Figure 2. Groundwater monitoring data are summarized in Table 1. Monitoring data sheets <br /> and well construction details are included in Attachment A. <br /> On February 25, 2004 through February 27, 2004 a Ground Zero technician collected <br /> groundwater samples from monitoring wells MW 1 through MW5, MW7, MW8, MW9, <br /> MW 12, MW13B, MW 14, MW 15A through MW15C, MW 16A and MW 16B; and from vapor <br /> wells VW 1 and VW3. <br /> A minimum of three well casing volumes was purged from each site well prior to sampling. <br /> During the purging process, physical parameters (pH, electrical conductivity, and temperature) <br /> were monitored. Subsequent to parameter stabilization, and a minimum of 90% recovery of <br /> initial depth to groundwater measurements, groundwater samples were collected and placed in <br /> an iced cooler for transport to Argon Laboratories (FLAP #2359) under chain of custody <br /> protocol. <br /> Analysis consisted of gasoline oxygenates, EDB and 1,2-DCA by EPA Method 8260B, TPHg <br /> by EPA Method 8015B and BTEX by EPA Method 8021B. Purge water was transferred into <br /> marked 55-gallon drums approved by the Department of Transportation (DOT). The waste is <br /> stored onsite within a secured area. Purge logs are included in Attachment A. <br /> GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Wells <br /> TPHg and benzene were detected in all sampled wells except MW7, MW9, MW12 and <br /> MW15A through MW15C. Dissolved TPHg and BTEX levels in the remaining monitoring <br /> j wells were within historical ranges, and appear to be stable to decreasing. TPHg and BTEX <br /> concentration data are summarized in Table 2. Attachment B contains laboratory reports and <br /> chain of custody documentation. <br /> MTBE was below laboratory method detection limits (MDLs) in wells MW1, MW2, MW5, <br /> MW8, MW13B, MW15C and MW1613. MTBE was detected in wells MW3 (52,000 parts per <br /> billion - ppb), MW4 (9,200 ppb), MW7 (150 ppb) and MW 14 (57,000 ppb) and MW 16A <br /> (1,500 ppb), which are located along the southern portion of the site (Figure 2). In <br /> downgradient wells MW 12, MW 15A and MW 15B, MTBE was reported at concentrations of <br /> 51 ppb, 9.3 ppb and 400 ppb, respectively. MTBE was also found in well MW9 (4.9 ppb), <br /> which is located north of the site. These wells are clearly affected by offsite releases. <br /> I�GZA FSIVOL 11DATA1GROUNDZE\ROEK%QMR12004%1gm2004.doc <br />