My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012863
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
W
>
WILSON
>
102
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545890
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012863
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2020 12:07:12 PM
Creation date
7/22/2020 11:59:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012863
RECORD_ID
PR0545890
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0025958
FACILITY_NAME
ROEK BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION
STREET_NUMBER
102
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
WILSON
STREET_TYPE
WAY
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15502065
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
102 S WILSON WAY
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LM <br /> LEED5HILL HEAKENHOFF INC <br /> September 1990 <br /> INTRODUCTION <br /> The following report summarizes Leedsh�ll_ <br /> Herkenhoff, Inc 's (LH) ongoing site <br /> ' investigation at 102 South Wilson Way, Stockton The site was formerly occupied by a <br /> gasoline station until 1978, when all tanks and appurtenances were removed <br /> An initial site assessment was conducted by Balbi & Chang Associates, Inc (BCA) in April <br /> of 1988 without contacting or obtaining appropriate permits from the San Joaquin County <br /> Public Health Services Consequently, the initial site assessment had to be repeated and <br /> ' the results were presented in a BCA report dated April 26, 1989. In RCA's studies, four <br /> soil borings and three monitoring wells were installed. The April 1989 report indicated <br /> some detectable BTX&E (benzene, toluene, xylene and ethylbenzene) and TPH (total <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline) in the soil and groundwater samples but the final <br /> conclusions contained conflicting information. <br /> In June of 1989, LH was contracted by the professional corporation of Neumdler & <br /> Beardslee and requested to conduct an additional site investigation to verify the presence <br /> or absence of soil and/or groundwater contamination and, if necessary, provide <br /> information regarding the vertical and lateral extent of such contamination <br /> In January of 1990, LH submitted a Preliminary Investigation Report which documented <br /> LH's investigation. This investigabon verified the existence of petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> contamination in the groundwater, but did not identify a current on-site source of this <br /> contamination from the areas investigated Soil Boring T135 indicated petroleum <br /> hydrocarbon contamination in the sod to a depth of 30 feet, but contained no detectable <br /> hydrocarbons below that depth_ <br /> In August 1990, as a part of its ongoing investigation, LH installed three additional soil <br /> borings near T135 located in the northwest corner of the site, in an attempt to determine <br /> the areal and vertical extent of soil contamination. One of these three borings was then <br /> converted into a 73-foot deep monitoring well to replace the nearby MW1, which has <br /> gone dry. This report presents the findings and conclusions of this supplemental <br /> investigation. <br /> 1 <br /> f <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.