Laserfiche WebLink
San Joaquin County DIRECTOR <br /> Donna Heran,REHS <br /> ,Q. iLlC' Environmental Health Department <br /> ` 0 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR <br /> 600 East Main Street Laurie Cotulla, REHS <br /> Stockton, California 95202-3029 <br /> PROGRAM COORDINATORS <br /> Mike Huggins,REHS, RDI <br /> cgcr �P Website: www.sjgov.org/ehd Margaret Lagorio,REHS <br /> FOR PRobert McClellon,REHS <br /> Phone: 468-3420 <br /> ( ) Jeff Carruesco,REHS,RDI <br /> Fax: (209)464-0138 Kasey Foley, REHS <br /> 12 June 2009 <br /> Messrs. Robert Trommer, CHG, and Kirk Larson, PG <br /> State Water Resources Control Board <br /> Division of Financial Assistance <br /> 1001 1 Street <br /> Sacramento CA 95814 <br /> Subject: EHD Comments on Annual Five-Year Review Various Sites <br /> The San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD) has received and reviewed <br /> your draft 5-year review updates on numerous sites and is providing comments on the following <br /> sites: <br /> • 1201 S. Center Street, Stockton <br /> • 300 S. California Street, Stockton, <br /> • 1250 N. Wilson Way, Stockton, <br /> • 2662 N. Wilson Way, Stockton; <br /> • 2151 Country Club Boulevard, Stockton <br /> EHD comments on other sites may be issued at a later time; the EHD comments on the above <br /> listed sites are as follows: <br /> 1201 S. Center Street - In your draft letter you recommend that the EHD direct the responsible <br /> Party (RP) to reduce monitoring and focus remaining resources on remediation. The EHD <br /> agrees with these recommendations; a directive letter is in preparation significantly reducing the <br /> sampling/analytical requirements. The responsible party and his consultant state that the delay <br /> in reimbursements from the State Board Cleanup Fund (CUF) is impeding their ability to start <br /> remediation. SVE wells have been installed, but trenching is needed to plumb them to an SVE <br /> unit. The EHD s scheduling a meeting with the.RP to set timetables for bringing his site into <br /> remediation. <br /> 300 S. California Street — Your draft letter recommends the EHD direct the RP to assess <br /> groundwater remedial technologies to more rapidly achieve water quality goals (WQOs). The <br /> EHD has met with the RP and their consultant; both claim economic hardship due to the delay <br /> in .reimbursements from the CUF, which is impeding their ability to maintain the current system. <br /> The groundwater extraction rate has been maximized, but further increase in the rate will <br /> exceed the RP's disposal permit and significantly increase disposal costs. <br /> 1250 S. Wilson Way — Your draft letter continues to recommend the EHD to direct the RP to <br /> assess remedial groundwater technologies and implement active remediation to achieve WQOs <br /> 5-Year Review Comment Letter B 0609.doc <br /> i <br />