Laserfiche WebLink
IMr Michael lnfuma <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br /> 2.3 Well Construction <br /> i <br /> Based on stratigraphy, current depth to groundwater measurements and historical depth to groundwater <br /> measurements, wells MW5 through MW7 were screened from 55 to 75 feet bgs and well MWID was <br /> screened from 95 to 100 feet bgs The wells were constructed of 2-inch diameter, Schedule 40 PVC <br /> Icasing and 0 020 inch slotted screen The filter pack consisted of 43 silica sand The annular seal <br /> contained 2 feet of bentomte overlain by neat cement grout to the ground surface Well construction <br /> logs are included in Attachment A <br /> 2.4 Well Development and Quarterly Groundwater Sampling <br /> On November 26, 2003, water levels in wells MWID, and MW5 through MW7 were monitored <br /> prior to planned development activities Depth to water ranged from 56 37 feet below the top of the <br /> well casing (btoc) in well MW7 to 57 00 btoc in well MWID Well MW5 was developed by <br /> surging pumping and bailing until turbidity was minimized Pump failure precluded development <br /> of the other wells Well development logs are included in Attachment B <br /> Water levels in all site wells were monitored on December 8, 2003 prior to the development of <br /> wells MWID, MW6 and MW7 Depth to groundwater in the shallow A zone wells (MW1 through <br /> I MW4) ranged from 56 38 feet btoc to 57 13 btoc Depth to groundwater in the intermediate B zone <br /> wells (MW5 through MW7) ranged from 55 38 feet btoc to 55 83 btoc Depth to groundwater in C <br /> zone well MWID was 57 47 btoc Water level data are summarized in Table 1 Field data sheets <br /> lie <br /> are included in Attachment B <br /> Groundwater elevation was determined in each well by subtracting the surveyed wellhead elevation <br /> from the respective depth to groundwater measurement Based upon the observation at the adjacent U- <br /> Haul site that potentiometic surface elevation and groundwater flow varies with completion depth, the <br /> wells at the site have informally been divided into three zones of completion a shallow or "A Zone" <br /> I represented by wells MWI, MW2, MW3 and MW4, an intermediate zone "B Zone" represented by <br /> wells MW5, MW6 and MW7, and a deeper "C Zone" (MWID) On December 8, the potentiometric <br /> surface of the A Zone wells ranged from 37 65 feet to 37 70 feet below mean sea level (MSL) The <br /> potentiometnc surface of the B Zone wells ranged from 37 65 feet to 37 67 feet below MSL The <br /> potentiometric surface in C Zone well MW 1 D was 38 01 feet below MSL The average hydraulic <br /> gradients in both the A and B zones were less than 0 001 ft/ft Potentiometnc surface maps for the A <br /> I and B Zones are depicted on Figures 2 and 3, respectively The elevation of well MWID is shown on <br /> Figure 2 <br /> I On December 8 and 9, new wells MWID, MW6 and MW7 were developed by surging pumping <br /> and bailing until turbidity was minimized The other wells were purged of at least three casing <br /> volumes prior to sampling Physical parameters (temperature, pH, electrical conductivity and <br /> turbidity were measured during the development of wells MWID, MW6 and MW7 and purging of <br /> wells MWI through MW5 Groundwater samples were collected after the physical parameters had <br /> stabilized, and the water level in each respective well recovered to at least 80% of its pre-purged <br /> level The samples were submitted to Argon under chain of custody protocol for the analysis of <br /> BTEX by EPA method 8021B, TPHg by EPA method 8015B and gasoline additives by EPA <br /> method 8260B Well development and purge logs are included in Attachment B <br /> I11GZA_FSIVOL_IIDATAIGROUNDZE\RARRYS\Reports\Well Report2 doc <br />