Laserfiche WebLink
r z - <br /> J. N. KLEINFELDER &ASSOCIATES <br /> 3.6 REMEDIAL ALTERNATIVE SCREENING <br /> The remedial alternatives presented in this section have been narrowed <br /> down from a larger list of options. We feel that these three alternatives <br /> represent viable treatment methods that warrant, further consideration. <br /> The following remedial alternative screening includes: (1) technical <br /> feasibility, (2) environmental criteria and considerations, and (3) cost. <br /> 1 , <br /> TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY SCREENIUg <br /> OBJECTIVE <br /> (A Technical feasibility screening will eliminate alternatives that are not <br /> based on proven technologies or are not compatible with site and/or waste <br /> �.{ characteristics and conditions. <br /> � rt <br /> APPROACH <br /> F� <br /> i <br /> y r{ <br /> It is planned to screen technologies considering technical reliability and <br /> Imo' implementability based on site-specific data developed during previous <br /> Es <br /> investigations. <br /> 1. Technical Reliability: <br /> Technical factors/criteria appropriate to reliability screening include <br /> the level of technology development, performance, and reliability. The. <br /> EPA guidance "Handbook for Remedial Actions at Waste Disposal Sites," a <br /> lifetime review and other appropriate references will be considered. <br /> 2. Implementability: <br /> C <br /> i <br /> Site specific data may limit or promote the use of a specific remedial <br /> alternative. For example, site topography may affect the construction of <br /> ---------_-- �,,.__...--------on-site--treatment--systems. ------The..extent-o€-_ground_..water._contamination-_°r - .--------- <br /> location of the water table may preclude certain types of ground water <br /> extraction techniques. :.Taste characteristics such as volatility, and <br /> i <br /> 33-87-887 11 <br /> i <br /> 4v <br />