Laserfiche WebLink
The transmissivnties calculated using the GWAP type curves matched to the suitable drawdown <br /> idata are presented in Attachment D These aquifer hydraulic properties follow <br /> Well Attachment Analysis Transnussivity Storage Hydraulic <br /> D Method (GPD')/Ft Coefficient Conductivity <br /> Figure (dimensionless) Ft/Day <br /> MW-5 D1 Unconf Elas , =0 001 5,854 05743 132 <br /> P-3 D2 Unconf Elas , ¢ =0 03 5,721 02979 129 <br />' P-5 D3 Unconf Elas , 3 =0 06 5,590 01171 126 <br /> P-2 D4 Unconf Elas , =0 1 5,217 01162 117 <br />' GPD = gallons per day <br /> 0,V <br /> The suppledrauhc conductivity for the four observation wells monitored is 126 Ft/Day, and <br /> Ithe simple average storage coefficient is 0 2764 These values are only applicable for the <br /> conditions present during the test <br /> The hydraulic properties reported above allow an analysis of the apparent aquifer horizontal <br /> anisotropy The anisotropy analysis is presented in Figure 4 The mayor hydraulic conductivity is <br /> about 133 Ft/Day oriented approximately N 78°W The corresponding minor hydraulic <br /> conductivity is about 82 Ft/Day oriented at a right angle <br /> 5 0 CAPTURE ZONE ANALYSIS OF EXTRACTION WELL EW-1 <br /> I <br /> A capture zone is defined as the area of an aquifer in which all of the groundwater will be <br />' removed by a pumping well (or wells) at a specific pumping rate over a certain period of time <br /> 5 1 CAPTURE ZONE METHODOLOGY <br /> The capture zone analyses for extraction well EW-1 was conducted using equations outlined in <br /> 3avandel and Tsang, 1986 for confined aquifers Work by Grubb, 1993 lists equations for both <br /> confined and unconfined aquifers However, the method of Grubb, 1993 incorporates data from <br /> wells upgradient and downgradient from an extraction well in order to ascertain discharge <br /> potentials across the field of the extraction well Furthermore, Grubb (1993) shows that the <br /> H2 0 GE 0 L A GROUND WATER CONSULTANCY <br />