Laserfiche WebLink
! lowered through the augers and #2112 filter pack sand will be placed in <br /> the annular space between the well casing and the borehole from the <br /> bottom of the boring to approximately 1-foot above the screened interval <br /> Approximately 05-feet of coated bentonite pellets will be placed on t o p <br /> of the sand pack prior to placing the cement sanitary seal Cement mixed <br /> with 3 to 5 percent bentonite powder by volume will be used to fill the <br /> annular space between the bentonite layer and the surface to prevent <br /> surface water from infiltrating into the well and to prevent conduits f o f <br /> the migration of contamination from shallow groundwater into deeper <br /> zones The cement seal in this well will be placed using a tremae pipe <br /> The well head will be protected with a locking well plug beneath an at- <br /> grade, traffic-rated well box (See Figure 6 - Typical Air Sparging Well) <br /> TASK 6 -CONDUCT AN AIR SPARGING TEST <br /> An air sparging test will be conducted to determine whether air sparging <br /> may be an effective method of remediation for the site The air sparging <br /> test will be conducted by injecting compressed air into the air sparging <br /> well at a rate of approximately 20 to 30 cubic feet per minute (c f m) <br /> Pressure and water levels in the surrounding wells will be monitored to <br /> determine whether there is any pressure increase in the vadose zone or <br /> mounding of the water table A helium gas tracer will also be injected <br /> through the air sparge well and a meter will monitor for the presence of <br /> helium in nearby wells <br /> TASK 7 -PREPARE A CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN FOR THE SITE <br /> Based on the results of the tests outlined above, ASE will prepare a <br /> corrective action plan (CAP) for the site This CAP will present several <br /> possible remediation strategies for the site including pump and treat, air <br /> sparge/vapor extraction, dual phase extraction, in-situ bioremediation <br /> and others Pros and cons or each method will be discussed, costs <br /> compared, and a method chosen if additional tests are needed to choose <br /> or design a method, these will be recommended All of the data a n d <br /> results for the feasibility tests detailed above will be discussed and the <br /> reports for the tests will be included as appendices Formal boring logs <br /> for the newly installed extraction well and air sparge well will also be <br /> included as will analytical reports and chain of custodies for any samples <br /> collected This report will be submitted under the seal of a California <br /> registered civil engineer or geologist <br /> Frank's One Stop Workplan — June 2000 <br /> -20- <br />