Laserfiche WebLink
ppb MTBE Groundwater samples collected from monitoring well MW-11 <br /> contained 910 ppb ethanol and 059 ppb 1 ,2-dichloropropane <br /> Groundwater samples collected from monitoring well MW-12 contained <br /> 380 ppb TPH-G, 58,000 ppb ethanol, 066 ppb 1,2-dlchloropropane, 1 3 <br />' ppb PCE and 056 ppb chloroform <br /> For groundwater samples collected from monitoring wells screened below <br />' 100-feet bgs, groundwater samples collected from monitoring well MW-8 <br /> contained 1 8 ppb MTBE, 9 8 ppb ethanol and 1 3 ppb 1 ,2- <br /> I dlchloropropane Groundwater samples collected from monitoring well <br /> MW-10 contained 3,900 ppb TPH-D and 72 ppb TBA <br />' The only compound detected in groundwater samples collected from the <br /> drinking water well was 20 ppb 1,2-dichloropropane <br /> 9 . 0 GROUNDWATER ELEVATIONS AND FLOW <br />' The ground surface elevation and top of casing elevation of each new <br /> groundwater monitoring well and piezometer was surveyed relative t o <br /> mean sea level (msl) by Farley Surveying, Inc of Stockton, California o n <br /> April 15, 2000 The northing and casting location of the wells a n d <br /> piezometers were surveyed relative to the California Coordinate System <br /> The benchmark used for this survey was the USGS M1164-1960 brass cap <br />' at the southeast corner of Airport Way and West Yosemite Avenue The <br /> survey information is presented in Appendix G <br /> Depths to groundwater were measured in each well prior to sampling o n <br /> March 16, 2000 with an electric water level sounder Depth t o <br />' groundwater measurements are presented in Table Four, and groundwater <br /> elevation (potentiometric surface) contours are plotted on Figures 10, 1 1 <br /> and 12 On March 16, 2000, groundwater in the shallow zone (less than <br /> 19-feet bgs) appeared to flow primarily to the northwest beneath the site <br /> at a gradient of approximately 0 012-feet/foot If the anomalous high <br /> water level in piezometer P-4 and anomalous low water level i n <br /> piezometer P-5 are disregarded, the potentiometric surface will show an <br /> even more obvious flow to the northwest at a very flat gradient of 0 0007- <br /> feet/foot Groundwater in the 55 to 70-feet bgs zone flowed to the east at <br /> a gradient of 0002-feet/foot Potentiometric surface contours for the <br /> deeper zone (below 100-feet bgs) could not be plotted because three non- <br /> linear points in this zone would be required for contouring <br /> Potentiometric surface measurements in locations with monitoring wells <br /> screened at multiple depths (MW-5 and MW-11, monitoring wells MW-1 <br /> and MW-12, monitoring wells MW-6, MW-7 and MW-8, and monitoring <br /> Franks One Stop Report — May 2000 <br /> -12- <br />