My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
2450
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506303
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2020 4:46:42 PM
Creation date
7/23/2020 4:27:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0506303
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0001086
FACILITY_NAME
MANTECA PUBLIC WORKS
STREET_NUMBER
2450
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
24130050
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2450 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WASTE DISCHARGE REQUOMENTS ORDER NO. R5-2004-002 -12- <br /> CITY OF MANTECA, CITY OF LATHROP AND DUTRA FARMS <br /> WASTEWATER QUALITY CONTROL FACILITY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> be utilized as representative of wastewater effluent sampling. The TSD recognizes that a <br /> minimum of ten data points is necessary to conduct a valid statistical analysis. The multipliers <br /> contained in Table 5-2 of the TSD are used to determine a maximum daily limitation based on a <br /> long-tern average objective. In this case, the long-term average objective is to maintain, at a <br /> minimum,the current plant performance level. Therefore,when there are less than ten sampling <br /> points for a constituent, interim limitations are based on 3.11 times the maximum observed <br /> sampling result to obtain the daily maximum interim limitation (TSD, Table 5-2). The Regional <br /> Board finds that the Discharger can undertake source control and treatment plant measures to <br /> maintain compliance with the interim limitations included in this Order. Interim limitations are <br /> established when compliance with NTR- and CTR-based effluent limitations cannot be achieved <br /> by the existing discharge. Discharge of constituents in concentrations in excess of the final <br /> effluent limitations,but in compliance with the interim effluent limitations, can significantly <br /> degrade water quality and adversely affect the beneficial uses of the receiving stream on a long- <br /> term basis. The interim limitations, however, establish an enforceable ceiling concentration until <br /> compliance with the effluent limitation can be achieved. <br /> 31. Dilution: As discussed in the information sheet, the Discharger developed a model to assess <br /> dilution and mixing zones. The accuracy of the model results are questionable due to a lack of <br /> site data to calibrate and validate the model, the lack of accounting for tidal cycles and <br /> recirculation, and the lack of accounting for the Brown Sand, Inc. discharge adjacent to the <br /> outfall. However, because there is no in-stream flow meter in the vicinity of the discharge to <br /> provide real-time data, this Order relies on flow information from the Vernalis monitoring <br /> station, as well as some of the model information as it is available. This Order also requires the <br /> Discharger to install a flow monitoring station in the vicinity of the outfall to provide real-time <br /> data to better assess available dilution. <br /> In the immediate vicinity of the outfall, little dilution is available for the side-bank discharge. hi <br /> addition,the dilution is reduced due to the added discharge from the Brown Sand impoundment <br /> immediately downstream. No dilution is available for the acute aquatic criteria due to the limited <br /> mixing of the side-bank discharge near the outfall, the commingling with an adjacent NPDES <br /> discharge, the 1-hour exposure interval that the acute criteria are intended to protect, and the <br /> periods of slack tide that can occur at low river flows. <br /> The SIP requires that a mixing zone not dominate or compromise the integrity of the entire water <br /> body and shall be as small as practicable. The thermal modeling,while not proven to be <br /> accurate, as discussed in the information sheet, presented a spatial definition to the changes in <br /> temperature that occur in the receiving water. This was used to define a mixing zone for <br /> constituents subject to chronic aquatic criteria and dilution to be determined at the edge of this <br /> mixing zone. As discussed further in the information sheet,the mixing zone will be restricted to <br /> the surface layer of the water column in a plume hugging the eastern shore of the river and <br /> extending to 450 feet downstream of the outfall. Temperature differences at the edge of this <br /> mixing zone indicate that a 4:1 dilution exists at the edge of this mixing zone. Therefore, for <br /> constituents subject to chronic aquatic criteria, a 4:1 dilution will be applied. This mixing zone <br /> will provide protection to the benthic community and minimize the impacts of the discharge to <br /> the river. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.