Laserfiche WebLink
WASTE DISCHARGE REQUOMENTS ORDER NO. R5-2004-002* -15- <br /> CITY OF MANTECA, CITYATHROP AND DUTRA FARMS <br /> WASTEWATER QUALITY CONTROL FACILITY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> December 2002 showed total THMs with a maximum concentration of 17 ug/1 and an average <br /> concentration of 10 ug/l. Chloroform data collected over the same period showed a maximum <br /> concentration of 12 ug/1 and an average concentration of 8 ug/l. Data is not available regarding <br /> the constituent concentrations in the receiving water. Considering the available dilution based on <br /> the harmonic mean flow of the San Joaquin River, the discharge does not have a reasonable <br /> potential to cause or contribute to an in-stream excursion above the water quality objective for <br /> MUN use by causing exceedance of the USEPA primary MCL for total THMs or the chloroform <br /> OEHHA cancer potency factor's equivalent receiving water concentration. Therefore, effluent <br /> limitations for total THMs and chloroform are not included in this Order. <br /> 36. Bromodichloromethane (BDCM) and dibromochloromethane (DBCM): Based on <br /> information included in analytical laboratory results submitted by the Discharger, the discharge <br /> has a reasonable potential to cause or contribute to an in-stream excursion above the CTR criteria <br /> for BDCM and DBCM. The CTR includes standards for the protection of human health based <br /> on a one-in-a-million cancer risk for these organic constituents. The criteria for waters from <br /> which both water and organisms are consumed are 0.56 ug/I and 0.41 ug/1 for BDCM and <br /> DBCM, respectively. The maximum observed effluent concentrations for BDCM and DBCM <br /> are 3.5 ug/I and 1.2 ug/l, respectively. Effluent limitations for BDCM and DBCM are included <br /> in this Order based on the CTR criteria for the protection of human health. The Discharger is <br /> able to comply with the limitations. <br /> 37. Trichlorophenol: Based on information included in analytical laboratory results submitted by <br /> the Discharger, the discharge has a reasonable potential to cause or contribute to an in-stream <br /> excursion above the CTR criteria for 2,4,6-trichlorophenol. The CTR includes standards for the <br /> protection of human health. The 2,4,6-trichlorophenol criteria for the protection of human health <br /> based on a one-in-a-million cancer risk for waters from which both water and aquatic organisms <br /> are consumed is 2.1 ug/l. The maximum observed effluent 2,4,6-trichlorophenol concentration is <br /> 11 ug/l. 2,4,6-trichlorophenol has not been detected in the upstream receiving water. Effluent <br /> Limitations for 2,4,6-trichlorophenol are included in this Order based on the CTR standard for <br /> the protection of human health. The Discharger is able to comply with the effluent limitations. <br /> 38. Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phtha1ate: Based on information included in analytical laboratory results <br /> submitted by the Discharger, the discharge has a reasonable potential to cause or contribute to an <br /> in-stream excursion above the CTR criteria for bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate. The CTR includes a <br /> standard for the protection of human health based on a one-in-a-million cancer risk for <br /> bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate of 1.8 ug/l. The maximum observed effluent bis(2-ethylhexyl)- <br /> phthalate concentration is 7 ug/l. Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate has not been detected in the <br /> upstream receiving water. Effluent Limitations for bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate are included in this <br /> Order based on the CTR criteria for the protection of human health. The Discharger is able to <br /> comply with the effluent limitations, <br /> 39. Mercury: Based on information submitted by the Discharger, the discharge contains mercury. <br /> The Delta waterways are listed in accordance with Clean Water Act Section 303(d) as impaired <br /> for mercury based on bioaccumulation of this pollutant in fish tissue. The CTR contains criteria <br /> for mercury. The CTR criteria,however, do not address bioaccumulation in the river. The <br />