My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1985-2004
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
2450
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506303
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1985-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2020 5:02:50 PM
Creation date
7/23/2020 4:28:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1985-2004
RECORD_ID
PR0506303
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0001086
FACILITY_NAME
MANTECA PUBLIC WORKS
STREET_NUMBER
2450
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
24130050
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2450 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
284
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD <br /> CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> ORDER NO. 99-051 <br /> REQUIRING THE CITY OF MANTECA AND CITY OF LATHROP <br /> WASTEWATER QUALITY CONTROL FACILITY <br /> TO CEASE AND DESIST <br /> FROM DISCHARGING CONTRARY TO REQUIREMENTS <br /> The California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region, (hereafter Board) finds: <br /> I. The City of Manteca wastewater treatment plant treats the flows from the City of Manteca and <br /> certain areas of the City of Lathrop. The City of Manteca is solely responsible for the wastewater <br /> treatment facility. <br /> 2. The Board, on 20 June 1997, adopted Order No. 97-115 (NPDES NO. CA 0081558) which <br /> prescribes requirements for an average discharge of 53 million gallons per day (mgd) of treated <br /> combined domestic and industrial wastewater to land and partially to surface water. The City of <br /> Manteca and the City of Lathrop(hereafter Discharger) were both named as dischargers on Order No. <br /> 97-115. Land disposal of effluent is maximized by seasonally discharging effluent at agronomic rates <br /> to existing City-owned irrigation fields and other leased property. Excess flows are discharged to the <br /> San Joaquin River. <br /> 3. The Board, on 24 July 1998, adopted Cease and Desist Order No. 98-169 which directed the City <br /> of Manteca and the City of Lathrop to implement a permit compliance workplan. The plan included <br /> identification and implementation of changes required at the wastewater treatment plant to ensure <br /> reliable compliance with Waste Discharge Requirements Order No. 97-115. The plan was to include <br /> evaluation of treatment options and any other measures which would ensure compliance, including, <br /> but not limited to, changes in test species to include rainbow trout in addition to the permitted <br /> fathead minnow, and consideration of effects of the acutely toxic discharge on ambient waters and <br /> beneficial uses. The above stated plan included a time schedule with full continuous compliance <br /> with Order 97-115 by 1 December 1998. <br /> 4. The City of Manteca and the City of Lathrop proceeded with the necessary work to comply with <br /> Order 98-169 and the time schedule. The Discharger for the past several months has been <br /> investigating the use of rainbow trout as an alternative species to the permitted fathead minnow for <br /> use on the 96 hour bioassay. The bioassay test results showed fathead minnows could tolerate total <br /> ammonia concentrations greater than 10 mg/1 while rainbow trout could not tolerate ammonia <br /> concentration above 20 mg/l. While operating the plant in a partial nitrification mode it has been <br /> found to be possible to maintain a constant effluent ammonia concentration of less than 20 mg/l, but <br /> extremely difficult to maintain a constant effluent ammonia concentration of less than 10 mg/l. <br /> Furthermore, comments from the U.S. E.P.A. state that they do not support the proposed change in <br /> test species to rainbow trout, a less sensitive species. The Discharger has for the present time <br /> withdrawn its request to use rainbow trout in the 96 hour bioassay. <br /> 5. The 24 July 1998 staff presentation, for the adoption of Order 98-169, noted "If major plant <br /> modifications are found to be necessary,the Cease and Desist Order will be brought back to the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.