My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1985-2004
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
2450
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506303
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1985-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2020 5:02:50 PM
Creation date
7/23/2020 4:28:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1985-2004
RECORD_ID
PR0506303
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0001086
FACILITY_NAME
MANTECA PUBLIC WORKS
STREET_NUMBER
2450
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
24130050
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2450 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
284
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INFORMATION SHEET ORSR NO. R5-2004-0028 . 5 <br /> CITY OF MANTECA, CITYOF LATHROP AND DUTRA FARMS <br /> WASTEWATER QUALITY CONTROL FACILITY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> 2.5 Evaluation of Available Dilution for Chronic Criteria <br /> The TSD states that: <br /> "Concentrations above the chronic criteria are likely to prevent sensitive taxa from taking up long- <br /> term residence in.the mixing zone. In this regard, benthic organisms and territorial organisms are <br /> likely to be ofgreatest concern. The higher the concentration occurring within the isopleth, the more <br /> taxa are likely to be excluded, thereby affecting the structure and function of the ecological <br /> community. It is thus important to minimize the overall size of the mixing zone and the size of elevated <br /> concentration isopleths within the mixing zone. " <br /> The temperature model,while subject to the limitations discussed in section 2.2,provides information <br /> used as a basis to establish available dilution for compliance with chronic criteria to protect aquatic <br /> life. The model concludes that, for the timed discharge, the four degree F differential would reach a <br /> maximum area of 0.3 acre and would be contained in a shallow(less than one foot in depth)plume that <br /> hugs the east river bank until dissipating 450 feet downstream. The model also shows that significant <br /> vertical mixing does not occur until about 500 feet downstream at which point there will be contact <br /> with the benthic community. This is illustrated in Figure 8 of the Resource Management Associates, <br /> 2000, analysis. Using the conclusions of the temperature model, a 4 degree temperature differential <br /> downstream where the effluent and receiving water have a 15°F initial difference indicates that mixing <br /> in the near field is small and does not reach 4:1 until nearly 450 feet downstream and 15:1 at 1300 feet <br /> downstream. Complete mixing,which is defined in the SIP as not more than a 5 percent difference in <br /> the concentration of a pollutant across a transect of the water body,would not occur until over 1000 <br /> feet downstream. The SIP requires that a mixing zone not dominate or compromise the integrity of the <br /> entire water body and shall be as small as practicable. The thermal modeling presented a spatial <br /> definition to the changes in temperature that occur in the receiving water as discussed in the previous <br /> paragraph. This allowed a mixing zone to be defined and dilution to be determined at the edge of this <br /> mixing zone. The mixing zone will be restricted to the surface layer of the water column in a plume <br /> hugging the eastern shore of the river and extending to 450 feet downstream of the outfall. <br /> Temperature differences at the edge of this mixing zone indicate that a 4:1 dilution exists at the edge of <br /> this mixing zone. For constituents subject to chronic aquatic criteria, a 4:1 dilution will be applied. <br /> This mixing zone will provide protection to the benthic community and minimize the impacts of the <br /> discharge to the river. <br /> 2.6 Evaluation of Available Dilution for Specific Constituents <br /> The overlap of the plumes from the City of Manteca and the Brown Sand impoundment will limit the <br /> extent of a mixing zone for arsenic, a constituent of mutual concern between these discharges. <br /> Additionally, the receiving water monitoring shows an average arsenic concentration of 3.0 ug/l, <br /> exceeding the USEPA recommended water quality criterion for protection of human health at the 1-in- <br /> a-million risk level. Therefore, the receiving water lacks assimilative capacity for arsenic, and there is <br /> no dilution available. <br /> The assimilative capacity of the river is dependent on the background concentration of the receiving <br /> water. Data collected in 2002 indicates that the receiving water has no assimilative capacity, and <br /> therefore no dilution can be granted for aluminum, electrical conductivity, iron, manganese, and <br /> mercury. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.