Laserfiche WebLink
INFORMATION SHEET ORO NO. R5-2004-0028 9 <br /> CITY OF MANTECA, CITY OF LATHROP AND DUTRA FARMS <br /> WASTEWATER QUALITY CONTROL FACILITY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> Studies by the National Marine Fisheries Service, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,the California <br /> Department of Fish and Game, the University of California at Davis, et. al., have identified the Central <br /> Valley Chinook Salmon and the Central Valley Steelhead as sensitive species that are affected by <br /> elevated temperatures in the San Joaquin River. There are four runs of salmon in the Central Valley <br /> that results in there being adults and juveniles in portions of the Delta every month of the year(Moyle, <br /> 2000). Generally, adults would be moving upstream in the fall, and fry and smolt moving downstream <br /> in the winter and spring. River temperatures above 68 °F are unsuitable for supporting sahnonoids <br /> (Draft E1R, 2000). Migration of adults is usually delayed when river temperatures reach this level. In <br /> a Department of Water Resources Study, adult salmon will cease migration if water temperatures are <br /> above 70 °F. At 77 °F, adult mortality may occur(Myrick, Cech, 2001). The Thermal Plan does not <br /> protect aquatic life from high temperature wastewater being discharged to an elevated temperature <br /> river. However, the Thermal Plan limits incremental increases in temperature. Discharge from the <br /> wastewater treatment plant of treated effluent with an elevated temperature may affect salmon and <br /> other migrating fish in the San Joaquin River. In so far as elevated temperature is deleterious to <br /> Chinook salmon, effluent temperature must be limited so as not to cause the receiving water to be <br /> harmful to the salmon. When the assimilative capacity of the river is diminished, effluent temperature <br /> must be held to the water quality criteria. The CALFED Bay-Delta Program target is to maintain water <br /> temperatures below 68 °F in migratory routes of anadromous fish in the spring and fall (CALFED, <br /> 2000). This Order requires the Discharger to study the thermal impacts to the receiving water <br /> associated with a discharge of treated effluent with elevated temperatures. <br /> 7 Antidegradation Analysis <br /> The Regional Board must consider antidegradation pursuant to 40 CFR 131.12 and State Board <br /> Resolution No. 68-16 and find that the permitted discharge is consistent with those provisions. <br /> With regard to surface water, the receiving water may exceed applicable water quality objectives for <br /> certain constituents as described in this Order. However, this Order requires the discharger, in <br /> accordance with specified compliance schedules, to meet requirements that will result in the use of best <br /> practicable treatment or control of the discharge and will result in compliance with water quality <br /> objectives. Table 1 of the information sheet provides an analysis of the mass loading to the receiving <br /> water for a number of constituents based on current operations and for an expanded discharge flow <br /> following plant upgrades. This Order requires compliance with technology-based standards and more <br /> stringent water quality-based standards. In developing effluent limitations, this Order allows the use of <br /> some of the assimilative capacity of the receiving water based on the current performance of the <br /> discharger and is consistent with the SIP. Where assimilative capacity is available in the receiving <br /> water,this Order does not authorize the full use of the assimilative capacity. This Order is consistent <br /> with California Water Code section 13263(b). Any further use of the assimilative capacity would not <br /> be consistent with Resolution 68-16. Compliance with these requirements will result in the use of best <br /> practicable treatment or control of the discharge. The impact on existing water quality will be <br /> insignificant. The total allowable discharge to surface water of 9.87 mgd has been increased from 6.95 <br /> mgd from the previous Order. The discharge is consistent with Resolution 68-16 and 40 CFR section <br /> 131.12 because this Order requires the discharger to meet requirements that will result in best <br /> practicable treatment or control to assure that pollution or nuisance will not occur prior to allowing <br /> flows to increase. <br />