My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1985-2004
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
2450
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506303
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1985-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2020 5:02:50 PM
Creation date
7/23/2020 4:28:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1985-2004
RECORD_ID
PR0506303
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0001086
FACILITY_NAME
MANTECA PUBLIC WORKS
STREET_NUMBER
2450
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
24130050
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2450 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
284
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Staff Report • • -4- <br /> City <br /> 4- <br /> City of Manteca and City of Lathrop <br /> Wastewater Quality Control Facility <br /> The Discharger modeled the mixing zone using the CORMIX computer model. The longest <br /> mixing zone is predicted to occur during the summer months at low river flow periods (641 cfs). <br /> For these conditions, the acute toxicity plumes are predicted to be 40 feet long. The cumulative <br /> cross sectional area of the plumes at the widest point would cover 1.4%of the river channel. The <br /> chronic toxicity plumes are predicted to be 51 feet long. The cumulative cross sectional area of <br /> the plumes at the widest point would cover 3.16%of the river channel. <br /> The Discharger has proposed different discharge conditions in summer and non-summer periods <br /> because of the historically lower ammonia effluent concentrations in the summer. <br /> PERMIT REVISIONS INCLUDE: <br /> • An ammonia limit of 31 mg N/1 during summer(June— September) and 35 mg N/1 during <br /> non-summer months (October—May)was added as a maximum discharge limitation. <br /> • Survival of aquatic organisms in 96-hour bioassays, diluted 2.8 parts River water to 1 part <br /> waste water effluent, shall be no less than: <br /> Minimum for any one bioassay- - - - - - - - - 70% <br /> Median for any three or more consecutive bioassays - - - - 90% <br /> • Discharges to the San Joaquin River is restricted to when river flows assure continuous <br /> mixing of the effluent with river water to limit the zone of acute and chronic toxicity to a <br /> minimal area. These restrictive periods were modeled under worst case conditions and <br /> found for summer or non-summer conditions to be when river flow velocity are less than <br /> 0.56 to 0.69 feet per second(ft/sec), respectively. This permit restricts discharges to <br /> when river flows are less than 0.56 ft/sec from June to September and 0.69 ft/sec from <br /> October to May. The lower river velocity during the summer reflects the tighter <br /> ammonia effluent limit in effect during the summer. <br /> • Revisions to this permit specify the construction of an effluent discharge diffuser to <br /> mitigate the effects of the discharge on benthic organisms. If it is found that the <br /> discharge affects benthic organisms with the diffuser in place, this Order will be reopened <br /> to consider further mitigation measures. <br /> • Revisions to this permit specify the use of existing effluent storage ponds to hold the <br /> volume of effluent discharged in 4 continuous hours at peak design dry weather flow <br /> conditions. The Discharger must provide design calculations showing the ponds will <br /> always have at least 2 feet of freeboard plus 2.5 million gallons additional capacity. The <br /> Discharger must also provide the operational criteria to be used for diversion of plant <br /> effluent to the storage ponds and for discharge from the ponds to the river. <br /> • To confirm the boundary conditions modeled in support of the permit revisions and to <br /> demonstrate the discharge does not cause acute or chronic toxicity outside the specified <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.