Laserfiche WebLink
REVISED WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS ORDER NO. 97-115 3 <br /> CITY OF MANTECA AND CITY OF LATHROP <br /> WASTEWATER QUALITY CONTROL FACILITY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> 12. The current configuration of the Discharger's side bank outfall likely causes adverse <br /> toxicological effects to the benthic organisms along the river bottom. A mixing zone <br /> using the current outfall design will continue to adversely affect benthic organisms, and <br /> could also impact fish habitat on the riverbank. Revisions to this permit specify the <br /> construction of an effluent discharge diffuser to mitigate the existing effects of the <br /> discharge on benthic organisms. If it is found that the discharge continues to affect <br /> benthic organisms with the diffuser in place, this Order will be reopened to consider <br /> further mitigation measures. <br /> 13. A 12-port diffuser will be installed to replace the existing side bank outfall. The diffuser <br /> design will mitigate the effluent's affect on benthic organisms and fish habitat. The <br /> conceptual design of the diffuser is shown in Attachment C. The twelve 8-inch diameter <br /> discharge ports are angled 15 degrees from horizontal and are located three feet above <br /> the river bottom. The ports are at eight-foot centers and are grouped 105 feet from both <br /> river banks to prevent toxic concentrations of ammonia from contacting the river banks. <br /> 14. Acute and chronic mixing zones for ammonia toxicity were predicted for the diffuser <br /> discharge using the Cornel Mixing Zone Expert System (CORMIX) computer model, <br /> which is one of US EPA's approved mixing zone models for near-field analysis. <br /> 15. A qualitative mixing analysis showed that at low river flows the effluent migrates across <br /> the River channel perpendicular to the River bank. At low tide periods, a 3-hour volume <br /> of undiluted effluent would potentially impact the entire 300+ foot width of channel. <br /> The acute and chronic toxicity concentration limits for ammonia would be exceeded <br /> across the River and 23 feet above and below the discharge location. The Discharger <br /> determined that this level of impact was unacceptable. The Discharger will mitigate this <br /> situation by discharging to the river only at high river velocities. <br /> 16. Revisions to this permit prohibit discharge to the river when the river velocity is less <br /> than 0.56 ft/sec from June to September and 0.69 ft/sec from October to May. The <br /> Discharger proposes to utilize existing effluent storage ponds sized to hold the volume <br /> of effluent discharged in 4 continuous hours at peak design dry weather flow conditions. <br /> The Discharger must provide design calculations showing the ponds will always have at <br /> least 2 feet of freeboard plus 2.5 million gallons additional capacity for the required <br /> storage. <br /> 17. The Discharger will provide process control criteria and a process schematic showing <br /> how and when plant effluent will be diverted to the storage ponds and how and when <br /> effluent will be discharged from the ponds to the river. <br /> 18. The CORMIX model's ammonia mixing zone prediction for the worst case mixing zone <br /> was considered to occur during drought conditions with high plant effluent flow (8.11 <br /> mgd). At drought conditions (assumed to occur for one month every 35 years), the river <br /> flow is at its lowest (641 cfs, 0.56 fps) and tidal influences are at the maximum. An <br />