Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br /> "The DWR and the USBR are partially responsible for salinity problems <br /> in the southern Delta because of hydrologic changes that are caused by export <br /> pumping. Therefore, this order amends the export permits of the DWR and of <br /> the USBR to require the projects to take actions that will achieve the benefits of <br /> the permanent barriers in the southern Delta to help meet the 1995 Bav-Delta <br /> Plan's interior Delta salinity objectives by April 1 2005 Until then the DWR <br /> and the USBR will be required to meet a salinity requirement of 1.0 mmhos/cm <br /> If after actions are taken to achieve the benefits of barriers it is determined that <br /> it is not feasible to fully implement the objectives the SWRCB will consider <br /> revising the interior Delta salinity objectives when it reviews the 1995 Bay-Delta <br /> Plan. . . ." (Revised Water Right Decision 1641, pp. 86-88, emphasis added.) <br /> Revised Water Right Decision 1641 summarized the State Board's conclusions <br /> regarding salinity problems in the southern Delta as follows: <br /> ". . . Salinity problems in the southern Delta result from low flows in the <br /> San Joaquin River and discharges of saline drainage water to the river. The <br /> actions of the CVP are the principal causes of the salinity concentrations <br /> exceeding the objectives at Vernalis. Downstream of Vernalis, salinity is <br /> influenced by San Joaquin River inflow, tidal action, diversions of water by the <br /> SWP, CVP, and local water users, agricultural return flows, and channel capacity. <br /> Measures that affect circulation in the Delta, such as barriers, can help improve <br /> the salinity concentrations." (Revised Water Right Decision 1641,p. 89.) <br /> Although the water right decision did not amend the water quality objectives in <br /> the 1995 Delta Plan, the decision defines the responsibilities of the Department of Water <br /> Resources and the Bureau of Reclamation for implementation of several provisions of the plan, <br /> including the southern Delta EC objectives. Footnote 5 to Table 2 of the decision provides that: <br /> "The 0.7 EC objective becomes effective on April 1, 2005. The DWR <br /> and USBR shall meet 1.0 EC at these stations year round until April 1, 2005. <br /> The 0.7 EC objective is replaced by the 1.0 EC objective from August after <br /> April 1, 2005 if permanent barriers are constructed or equivalent measures are <br /> implemented in the southern Delta and an operations plan that reasonably <br /> protects southern Delta agriculture is prepared by the DWR and the USBR and <br /> approved by the Executive Director of the SWRCB. The SWRCB will review <br /> the salinity objectives for the southern Delta in the next review of the Bay-Delta <br /> objectives following construction of the barriers." (Revised Water Right <br /> Decision 1641, p. 182.) <br /> The most recent State Board action with respect to the EC water quality <br /> objectives in the southern Delta was adoption of State Board Resolution No. 2004-0062 on <br /> 9. <br />