My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
2450
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506303
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2020 5:02:58 PM
Creation date
7/23/2020 4:33:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
RECORD_ID
PR0506303
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0001086
FACILITY_NAME
MANTECA PUBLIC WORKS
STREET_NUMBER
2450
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
24130050
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2450 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
736
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
discharged into San Joaquin River would not be substantial in relation to the total flow rate of the San <br /> Joaquin River. Therefore, the project would not cause flooding downstream of the WQCF along the San <br /> Joaquin River. This is considered a less-than-significant impact. <br /> Implementation of the project would result in the discharge of up to an additional 17.13 million gallons of treated <br /> effluent into the San Joaquin River per day. The amount of water flowing in the San Joaquin River near the <br /> project site is estimated to be 1,899,000 acre-feet per year. The increased amount of treated effluent that would be <br /> discharged into the San Joaquin River from implementation of the project would account for approximately 1.0% <br /> of the total water flowing in San Joaquin River(1.899 million acre-feet per year= 1,695 million gallons per day; <br /> 17.13 mgd/ 1,695 mgd= 1.0%). Because the increased flows in the San Joaquin River from the treated effluent <br /> discharged from the project are minor in comparison to the overall volume of water in the river, lands downstream <br /> of the project site are not expected to be exposed to increased flooding risk. Therefore,the project would result in <br /> a less-than-significant impact related to off-site flooding risks. <br /> Surface Water Quality Impacts <br /> The results of the near-field and far-field water quality analyses described above are presented in this section. For <br /> a number of parameters(total suspended solids (TSS),turbidity,coliform organisms, etc.)the impact of the <br /> discharge of effluent from the Manteca WQCF into the San Joaquin River(San Joaquin River)would result in a <br /> localized improvement in water quality,because their low levels in the discharge compared to higher levels in the <br /> San Joaquin River would have a localized diluting effect within the mixing zone. For example,the 50th percentile <br /> TSS level in the San Joaquin River at sampling station R-1 (just upstream of the WQCF discharge)is 26.7 mg/1. <br /> The existing effluent level is 10 mg/1 and the projected effluent concentration level after Phase III completion <br /> would be 10 mg/l. <br /> This subsection provides impact assessments for constituents of concern for which quantitative water quality <br /> modeling was performed. For a detailed description of the water quality modeling approach, see Appendix D. <br /> Near-field, zone-of-initial-mixing water quality concerns center upon: (1)the potential for discharge-driven <br /> exceedances of applicable water quality standards; and(2)plumes of elevated contaminant concentrations and <br /> temperature that could adversely impact fish and/or other aquatic biota and thus certain aquatic life uses.No <br /> municipal/domestic, industrial, or irrigation diversions occur from the San Joaquin River within the zone of initial <br /> mixing;therefore,potential project-specific water quality impacts to these beneficial uses were based primarily on <br /> the far-field(i.e., fully mixed)modeling results. Hence,the potential for project-specific water quality impacts to <br /> recreational uses were assessed using the far-field(i.e., fully mixed)modeling results. Finally,project-specific <br /> changes to near-field and far-field water quality would have no effect on the navigation beneficial use. <br /> Near-Field Impacts <br /> IMPACT Hydrology and Water Quality—Effects of Proposed Project Discharge on Biochemical Oxygen <br /> 4.9-4 Demand(BOD)Concentrations in Receiving Waters. The project is projected to reduce effluent BOD <br /> concentrations compared to the existing WQCF discharge concentrations and projected concentrations <br /> would be below the City's existing adopted NPDES effluent limitation, which has been established by the <br /> RWQCB to be protective of water quality. Therefore, this impact is considered less than significant. <br /> The consumptive oxygen demand of BOD reduces ambient dissolved oxygen(DO) levels in the river,and <br /> therefore a connection exists between BOD and DO concentrations. The influence of the WQCF BOD input is <br /> most strongly expressed as an oxygen demand downstream of the City's wastewater outfall. Therefore the impact <br /> of WQCF effluent on DO levels in the San Joaquin River is addressed in the Far-Field Impacts Analysis,which <br /> incorporates the near-field BOD analysis. See Impact 4.9-19 below. <br /> There is no adopted water quality objective for BOD in the San Joaquin River. The incremental change in BOD <br /> concentration and mass loading in the San Joaquin River due to an increase in WQCF effluent discharged from <br /> DER EDAW <br /> City of Manteca 4.9-33 Hydrology and Water Quality <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.