My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
2450
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506303
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2020 5:02:58 PM
Creation date
7/23/2020 4:33:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
RECORD_ID
PR0506303
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0001086
FACILITY_NAME
MANTECA PUBLIC WORKS
STREET_NUMBER
2450
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
24130050
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2450 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
736
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
These incremental increases in river ammonia concentrations and mass loadings observed when evaluating the <br /> June through September(associated with the EPA chronic ammonia criterion)and October through May <br /> (associated with the EPA acute ammonia criterion)time periods are shown in Exhibits 4.9-3 and 4.9-4, <br /> respectively. <br /> Because the consumptive oxygen demands of ammonia nitrification are most strongly expressed downstream of <br /> the City's wastewater outfall,the impact of WQCF effluent ammonia levels on dissolved oxygen(DO)levels in <br /> the San Joaquin River are evaluated in the far-field analysis in a discussion of far-field DO impacts(see Impact <br /> 4.9-19 below). <br /> The near-field analysis shows that projected,median ammonia concentrations in the San Joaquin River would <br /> range from 0.17 to 0.22 mg/1 for dry/below normal and critical water years,respectively,which is substantially <br /> below the more stringent chronic criterion of 0.62 mg/l for the June through September time period. Further, <br /> ammonia concentrations would be substantially lower than the acute criterion of 5.62 mg/1 during the October <br /> through May time period with concentrations ranging from 0.13 to 0.17 mg/l for dry/below normal and critical <br /> water years,respectively. Because the project would result in ammonia concentrations that are below adopted <br /> water quality criterion,the project's near-field ammonia impacts would be less than significant. <br /> IMPACT Hydrology and Water Quality—Effects of Proposed Project Discharges on Arsenic(Dissolved) <br /> 4.9-9 Concentrations in Receiving Waters. The project would be designed and operated to comply with the <br /> NPDES permit effluent limits for dissolved arsenic and projected dissolved arsenic concentrations would be <br /> substantially below adopted water quality objectives. Therefore, the project's near-field arsenic <br /> concentrations would be less than significant. <br /> Manteca WQCF NPDES self-monitoring data from the San Joaquin River at monitoring location R-1 (just <br /> upstream of the WQCF discharge) for dry/below normal water years were used to calculate an estimated impact <br /> of WQCF effluent ammonia in the San Joaquin River under critical(600 cfs)and dry/below normal(1,250 cfs) <br /> river flows at the existing permitted discharge of 9.87 mgd and at proposed discharges of 17.5 mgd and 27 mgd. <br /> The average total arsenic concentration after the WQCF buildout(27 mgd)is projected to be 8 ug/1. Although the <br /> projected effluent concentration is presented as total Arsenic, for the purpose of the near-field analysis, and to be <br /> conservative, all arsenic present in WQCF treated effluent is assumed to be in the dissolved form. The RWQCB is <br /> required to assign an effluent limit to the total fraction of a metal; limits are not assigned to the dissolved fraction. <br /> The project's effluent quality for metals is the projected concentration of the total fraction of a metal. However, <br /> tertiary treated effluent has all of its suspended particles removed by the very fine tertiary filtration process, <br /> leaving only dissolved constituents in the effluent, and the Basin Plan water quality objective for arsenic specifies <br /> that compliance is determined through comparison of the objective with dissolved arsenic concentrations. <br /> Because the Basin Plan water quality objective for arsenic specifies that compliance is determined through <br /> comparison of the objective with dissolved arsenic concentrations, it is appropriate to state that all arsenic in <br /> WQCF tertiary effluent will be considered to be in the dissolved form. <br /> The incremental change in near-field(measured at R-3, see Exhibit 4.9-1)dissolved arsenic concentrations in the <br /> San Joaquin River resulting from an increase in WQCF effluent discharged from the current permitted rate(9.87 <br /> mgd)to the proposed rate (27 mgd) is projected to range from 0.13 ug/1 to 0.25 ug/1 during dry/below normal and <br /> critical water years,respectively. Total downstream(measured at R-3)dissolved arsenic concentrations would <br /> range from 2.12 to 2.32 ug/1 during dry/below normal and critical water years,respectively(LWA 2007). The <br /> Basin Plan objective for dissolved arsenic in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta is 10 ug/L, expressed as the <br /> dissolved fraction(CVRWQCB 2006b). Projected,median dissolved arsenic concentrations at full buildout(27 <br /> mgd) are well below the Basin Plan objective. Because the project would result in dissolved arsenic <br /> concentrations that are below adopted water quality objectives,the project's near-field arsenic impacts would be <br /> less than significant. <br /> DER EDAW <br /> City of Manteca 4.9-39 Hydrology and Water Quality <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.