My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
2450
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506303
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2020 5:02:58 PM
Creation date
7/23/2020 4:33:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
RECORD_ID
PR0506303
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0001086
FACILITY_NAME
MANTECA PUBLIC WORKS
STREET_NUMBER
2450
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
24130050
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2450 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
736
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
analysis, and to be conservative, all manganese present in WQCF treated effluent is assumed to be in the <br /> dissolved form for the same reasons as described above for arsenic. <br /> Dissolved manganese mass loading to the San Joaquin River is projected to be slight relative to existing in-stream <br /> loads and would only increase by 1.5 lbs/day with buildout of the WQCF. The highest estimated downstream <br /> monitoring location R-3 river concentration of 14.2 gg/l(under existing and proposed buildout scenarios)would <br /> be less than the current ambient concentration of 14.3 gg/l measured at monitoring location R-1. Because the <br /> projected effluent manganese concentration at the point of discharge would be 10 gg/1,which is less than ambient <br /> river concentrations,the project would have a diluting effect and downstream San Joaquin River concentrations <br /> are anticipated to decrease with implementation of the project. Further,projected manganese concentrations for <br /> the San Joaquin River would be substantially below the adopted Basin Plan objective of 50 gg/1. Therefore,the <br /> project's near-field manganese impacts would be less than significant. <br /> IMPACT Hydrology and Water Quality—Effects of Proposed Project Discharges on Methylene Blue Active <br /> 4.9.14 Substances(MBAS)Concentrations in Receiving Waters. The project would be designed and operated <br /> to comply with the NPDES permit effluent limits for MBAS, which are, in turn, based on the lowest criteria <br /> determined to be protective of beneficial uses. The proposed project is projected to produce treated effluent <br /> having an average total manganese concentration of 160,ug/I, which is well below the adopted Basin Plan <br /> objective. Therefore, the project's near-field MBAS impacts would be less than significant. <br /> Manteca WQCF NPDES self-monitoring data from the San Joaquin River at monitoring location R-1 (just <br /> upstream of the WQCF discharge)for dry/below normal water years was used to calculate an estimated impact of <br /> WQCF effluent Methylene Blue Active Substances(MBAS) in the San Joaquin River under critical(600 cfs)and <br /> dry/below normal(1,250 cfs)river flows at the existing permitted discharge of 9.87 mgd and at proposed <br /> discharges of 17.5 and 27 mgd. Because a limited MBAS receiving water data set featuring all nondetected <br /> monitoring location R-1 data was available for the near-field analysis,an estimated MBAS concentration at <br /> monitoring location R-1 was used. The ambient MBAS concentration employed in the near-field analysis was <br /> estimated using the median method detection limit(MDL)associated with the nondetected data(LWA 2006a). <br /> The Basin Plan adopted water quality objective for MBAS is 500 pg/l. The median MDL for MBAS from the <br /> City's NPDES self-monitoring data is 20 gg/1. The proposed project is projected to produce treated effluent <br /> having an average total manganese concentration of 160 pg/l,which is well below the adopted Basin Plan <br /> objective. Therefore,the project's near-field MBAS impacts would be less than significant. <br /> IMPACT Hydrology and Water Quality—Effects of Proposed Project Discharges on Nitrate (as Nitrogen) <br /> 4.9.15 Concentrations in Receiving Waters. The project would be designed and operated to comply with the <br /> NPDES permit effluent limits for nitrate, which are, in turn, based on the lowest criteria determined to be <br /> protective of beneficial uses. Projected nitrate concentrations would be well below the adopted Basin Plan <br /> objective of 10 mg/I. Therefore, the project's near-field nitrate impacts would be less than significant. <br /> Manteca WQCF NPDES self-monitoring data from the San Joaquin River at monitoring location R-1 (just <br /> upstream of the WQCF discharge) for dry/below normal water years were used to calculate an estimated impact <br /> of WQCF effluent nitrate(as nitrogen)in the San Joaquin River under critical(600 cfs) and dry/below normal <br /> (1,250 cfs)river flows at the existing permitted discharge of 9.87 mgd and at proposed discharges of 17.5 mgd <br /> and 27 mgd. The project is projected to produce treated effluent having an average nitrate concentration of 5 mg/l. <br /> The Basin Plan utilizes the adopted Title 22 Primary MCL water quality criterion for nitrate plus nitrite (sum as <br /> nitrogen)of 10 mg/1. Projected average total concentrations of nitrate in WQCF effluent at the point of discharge <br /> would be 5 mg/1,which is substantially below the adopted Basin Plan objective. Projected median nitrate <br /> concentrations in the San Joaquin River downstream of the WQCF outfall(measured at R-3,Exhibit 4.9-1)would <br /> range from 2.63 to 2.71 mg/l during dry/below normal and critical water years,respectively. Therefore,the <br /> project's near-field nitrate impacts would be less than significant. <br /> EDAW DER <br /> Hydrology and Water Quality 4.9-42 City of Manteca <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.