My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
2450
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506303
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2020 5:02:58 PM
Creation date
7/23/2020 4:33:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
RECORD_ID
PR0506303
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0001086
FACILITY_NAME
MANTECA PUBLIC WORKS
STREET_NUMBER
2450
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
24130050
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2450 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
736
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IMPACT Hydrology and Water Quality—Effects of Proposed Project Discharges on Dissolved Organic <br /> 4.9-21 Carbon (DOC) Concentrations in Receiving Waters.Projected incremental changes in DOC <br /> concentrations at far-field monitoring locations would be less than 1 percent during critical water years and <br /> less than 3 percent during dry/below normal water years. These changes would not be substantial in <br /> relation to existing DOC concentration. Therefore, the project's far-field DOC impacts would be less than <br /> significant. <br /> The DHS has not recommended a Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for DOC. The RWQCB also has not <br /> adopted a water quality objective for DOC. For both critical and dry/below normal water year types,the <br /> calculated change in DOC at the selected sites is generally less than 0.03 mg/1 with buildout of the WQCF,with <br /> the exception of the Stockton Ship Channel Turning Basin where the change is estimated to be 0.08 mg/l during a <br /> dry/below normal water year. Median DOC concentrations at far-field monitoring locations range from 3.50 mg/l <br /> to 3.94 during critical water years and 2.72 to 3.51 during dry/below normal water years. Projected incremental <br /> changes in DOC concentrations at far-field monitoring locations would be less than 1 percent during critical water <br /> years and less than 3 percent during dry/below normal water years. These changes would not be substantial in <br /> relation to existing DOC concentration. Therefore,the project's far-field DOC impacts would be less than <br /> significant. <br /> IMPACT Hydrology and Water Quality—Effects of Proposed Project Discharges on Nitrate(as Nitrogen) <br /> 4.9-22 Concentrations in Receiving Waters.Modeling results for nitrate as nitrogen corresponding to critical and <br /> dry/below normal water years, respectively, demonstrated that, for both water year types the calculated <br /> change in nitrate as nitrogen at the selected sites is estimated to be no greater than 0.05 mg/1 with buildout <br /> of the WQCF(27 mgd). Median nitrate concentrations at far-field monitoring locations would all be <br /> substantially below adopted Basin Plan objectives. Therefore, the project's far-field nitrate impacts would be <br /> less than significant. <br /> For both critical and dry/below normal water year types,the calculated change in nitrate as nitrogen at the <br /> selected sites is generally less than 0.02 mg/1 with buildout of the WQCF (27 mgd),with the exception of the <br /> Stockton Ship Channel Turning Basin where the change is estimated to be 0.05 mg/l under dry/below normal <br /> water years. Median nitrate concentrations at far-field monitoring locations range from 0.52 mg/1 to 0.91 mg/1 <br /> during critical water years and 0.22 mg/1 to 1.64 mg/1 during dry/below normal water years. Median nitrate <br /> concentrations at far-field monitoring locations would all be substantially below adopted Basin Plan objectives. <br /> Therefore, the project's far-field nitrate impacts would be less than significant. <br /> IMPACT Hydrology and Water Quality—Construction and Operation of the Proposed Master Plan Facilities <br /> 4.9-23 and Control of Stormwater Runoff. The proposed project would involve updating and implementing a <br /> stormwater pollution prevention plan to assure compliance with applicable stormwater discharge permits. <br /> These and related actions(e.g., implementation of construction BMPs) that would be taken as part of <br /> and/or in response to the proposed project would minimize the impact of construction and operational <br /> stormwater quality impacts. Therefore, the project would result in a less-than-significant impact <br /> stormwater quality impacts. <br /> Impacts to water quality due to stormwater runoff from a facility can generally originate from: (1) construction <br /> activities, such as grading and excavation; and(2) contaminant spills that could occur from day-to-day facilities <br /> operations. Storm water runoff from the WQCF site flows into the general drainage system. Proposed facilities <br /> that would be connected to the general drainage system include equipment, chemical tanks, sanitary, and solids <br /> processing overflow drainage. <br /> The WQCF operates under a General Industrial Storm Water Discharge Permit(General Permit) adopted by the <br /> SWRCB. A condition of the General Permit is the requirement to prepare and keep on site a stormwater pollution <br /> prevention plan(SWPPP). The major objectives of the SWPPP are to: (1)identify pollutant sources that may <br /> EDAW DER <br /> Hydrology and Water Quality 4.9-48 City of Manteca <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.