Laserfiche WebLink
Vernalis Adaptive Management Plan <br /> VAMP, officially initiated in 2000 as part of the SWRCB Decision 1641 (as revised),is a large-scale, long-term <br /> (12-year), experimental/management program designed to protect juvenile Chinook salmon migrating from the <br /> San Joaquin River through the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta. VAMP is also a scientifically recognized <br /> experiment to determine how salmon survival rates change in response to alterations in San Joaquin River flows <br /> and SWP/CVP exports with the installation of the Head of Old River Barrier(HORB). VAMP employs an <br /> adaptive management strategy to use current knowledge of hydrology and environmental conditions to protect <br /> Chinook salmon smolts,while gathering information to allow more efficient protection in the future. <br /> 4.13.2 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS <br /> ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY <br /> Approach Overview <br /> The proposed project could change water quality in the San Joaquin River, in the vicinity of the discharge(i.e., <br /> near-field),and at downstream Delta locations (fully mixed far-field). The project would have negligible, if any, <br /> effects on water quality in water bodies (other than the San Joaquin River)upstream of Manteca. Moreover,the <br /> project would not cause, either directly or indirectly,hydrologic changes of a magnitude and frequency that could <br /> adversely affect aquatic resources, either upstream or downstream of the point of effluent discharge(see Section <br /> 4.9, "Hydrology and Water Quality"of this EIR for further discussions regarding hydrologic effects of the <br /> proposed project). <br /> The statewide SWP/CVP system could undergo hydrologic and operational changes in the future that would have <br /> seasonal effects on San Joaquin River flows. These changes would be caused by increased diversion demands <br /> (resulting from population growth within the region)and increased water releases (resulting from water quality <br /> management and/or environmental restoration initiatives), and associated changes in SWP/CVP operations. The <br /> potential impacts of future hydrologic and SWP/CVP operational changes on fisheries and aquatic resources, <br /> caused by future changes in surface water hydrology within the Manteca WQCF project vicinity,have already <br /> undergone CEQA review(see Final EIR for Meeting Flow Objectives for the San Joaquin River Agreement 1999- <br /> 2010 [1999] and Supplemental EIS/EIR for Acquisition of Additional Water for Meeting the San Joaquin River <br /> Agreement Flow Objectives, 2001-2010 [2001])and,therefore, are not re-assessed in this EIR. These documents <br /> are hereby incorporated by reference into this EIR. <br /> Based on the above and the project description(see Chapter 3),the potential for the project to adversely affect <br /> fisheries and aquatic resources within the study area is via effects on water quality. Consequently, a thorough <br /> analysis of the project's effects on the water quality of the San Joaquin River in the vicinity of the discharge and <br /> at downstream Delta locations is presented in Section 4.9, "Hydrology and Water Quality."The methodology <br /> used for these water quality assessments is presented in Section 4.9 with additional detail provided in Appendix C <br /> (LWA 2007). <br /> Effects of project-related water quality on fish and other aquatic resources downstream of the Manteca WQCF <br /> discharge were evaluated based on appropriate water quality criteria for the protection of freshwater aquatic life <br /> and other relevant technical information as reported in scientific literature. Separate discussions for the <br /> assessment of conventional parameters and priority pollutants, and temperature are provided below. <br /> Conventional Parameters and Priority Pollutants <br /> A step-wise evaluation process was employed to assess the potential effects of conventional parameters(e.g.,pH, <br /> BOD,turbidity,nutrients, etc.) and priority pollutants under proposed project conditions (see Section 4.9). The <br /> first step involved evaluating compliance with applicable water quality criteria(CTR/NTR), water quality <br /> Manteca WQCF and Collection System Master Plans EIR EDAW <br /> City of Manteca 4.13-15 Fisheries and Aquatic Resources <br />