My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
2450
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506303
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2020 5:02:58 PM
Creation date
7/23/2020 4:33:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
RECORD_ID
PR0506303
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0001086
FACILITY_NAME
MANTECA PUBLIC WORKS
STREET_NUMBER
2450
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
24130050
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2450 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
736
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
seek the coldest water temperatures available along their migration route.Numerous studies have shown that fish, <br /> when presented with a range of temperatures,will seek a temperature that is preferred, and will not submit <br /> themselves to temperatures sufficiently high to cause adverse physiological effects when given options(Cherry et <br /> al. 1975; Gray et al. 1977; Biro 1998). <br /> As fish migrate upstream and begin to encounter and move into the thermal plume,temperature differences from <br /> river background become greater and they may gradually encounter unfavorably high water temperatures. These <br /> fish would either move laterally within the river channel until they encounter either more tolerable temperatures <br /> or the unaffected zone of passage along the other shoreline, or they would move higher or lower in the water <br /> column seeking more favorable temperatures. Because a zone of passage (unaffected by the effluent plume) <br /> remains along the west river margin under all conditions modeled and it is sufficiently wide(i.e., 150 feet) <br /> (Appendix F),the fish would be allowed to move laterally and continue upstream with minimal delay. <br /> Additionally,because the thermal waters of the plume are more buoyant and therefore, spread wider at the surface <br /> of the water column,they could move into deeper water and continue along more of a mid-channel migration <br /> route that would expose them to temperatures less different, or even no different, from river background. In either <br /> case, should fish swim or"drift"back toward the affected area of the plume before passing the discharge outfall, <br /> the same behavioral response would be repeated until the fish moved past the outfall. <br /> If fish were to move into the plume, exposure time would be expected to be limited based on their ability to swim <br /> rapidly. Cruising speeds (i.e.,the speed at which a fish can swim for an extended period of time) for adult chinook <br /> salmon and steelhead typically fall within 2 to 4 body lengths/second or approximately 1.5 to 3 feet/second(fps) <br /> (based on size) (Bell 1986). Adult salmonids are capable of maintaining sustained swimming velocities of up to <br /> 4.6 fps and burst speeds in excess of 20 fps,depending on water velocity and temperature(Powers and Orsborn <br /> 1990). Therefore, if fish were to move into the thermal plume,their ability to rapidly move out of the elevated <br /> water temperatures would result in short exposure time(e.g., on the order of minutes). <br /> An example of this movement tendency was documented by Becker(1973). Based on tracking studies of Chinook <br /> salmon and steelhead migration past the discharge of heated effluent in the Columbia River, it was concluded that <br /> (a)no complete thermal barrier to salmonid migration existed, (b)upstream spawning was not affected, (c) fish <br /> were capable of detecting temperature change and changing migration paths, and(d)there was no detectable <br /> difference in migration rates when water temperatures downstream of the discharge were elevated by 3.57 to <br /> 5.5°F above ambient summer water temperatures of 68°F measured upstream of the discharge. <br /> Analysis Summary <br /> At approximately 1,500 feet downstream of the discharge outfall, approximately half(i.e., 51%)of the river cross- <br /> sectional area(along the east bank river margin)would be affected by the effluent plume(Appendix F). As such, <br /> an approximate 150-foot zone of passage exists for the fish species in the west margin of the water column.As the <br /> fish move closer to the discharge,the portion of the water column(i.e., cross-sectional area)affected by the <br /> effluent plume decreases slightly. Within 450 feet of the discharge outfall,47%of the water column is affected by <br /> the plume.At 250 feet downstream of the discharge,where internal plume temperatures can show substantial <br /> differences from river background,particularly under the"worst-case"scenario(Appendix F), 59% of the river <br /> cross-section along the west margin of the river is unaffected by the plume. Based on the plume dynamics <br /> simulated within the river channel under the"worst-case"conditions, adult fish undertaking upstream spawning <br /> migrations past the WQCF discharge outfall would be presented with an adequate zone of passage during winter <br /> months. <br /> Based on results of this assessment,the discharge plume associated with build-out of the proposed project <br /> (increased capacity up to 27 mgd)has the potential to result in behavioral avoidance of elevated water <br /> temperatures within the plume of thermal water downstream from the point of discharge.Avoidance of the plume <br /> is considered to be a short-duration impediment to migration. The plume would not result in a complete barrier to <br /> migration. Based on the area of the river cross-section affected by elevated water temperatures,the unaffected <br /> EDAW Manteca WQCF and Collection System Master Plans EIR <br /> Fisheries and Aquatic Resources 4.13-22 City of Manteca <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.