My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
2450
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506303
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2020 5:02:58 PM
Creation date
7/23/2020 4:33:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
RECORD_ID
PR0506303
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0001086
FACILITY_NAME
MANTECA PUBLIC WORKS
STREET_NUMBER
2450
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
24130050
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2450 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
736
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
approximately one month. The DW diversion could occur in any month but would occur only when the amount of <br /> allowable water for export is greater than the permitted pumping rate of the export pumps. <br /> Potential water quality impacts associated with this project include increases in salinity, dissolved organic carbon, <br /> and possibly changes in other water quality variables. In 2001,the SWRCB certified the EIR on the Delta <br /> Wetlands Project. In February 2007,the Public Policy Institute of California(PPIC)released a comprehensive <br /> study of the DW which assessed current challenges facing the Delta including its ecosystem,water supply <br /> reliability,water quality, and existing land uses and also identified potential options that state leaders should <br /> explore this year in implementing a long-term solution for preserving the Delta. According to the latest <br /> information release(February 7,2007),the DW is still currently being studied by the California Bay-Delta <br /> Authority and the California Department of Water Resources. <br /> 5.2.4 LARGE-SCALE WATER QUALITY PROGRAMS <br /> Because the project would influence and be influenced by several large-scale water quality programs,the"plan" <br /> approach was used to evaluate cumulative impacts on a regional scale. The regional cumulative analysis area <br /> covers the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta region and includes an evaluation of the following programs: <br /> STATE OF CALIFORNIA TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD PROGRAM <br /> The State of California Total Maximum Daily Load(TMDL)Program establishes a process that provides a <br /> framework for identifying load reductions or other actions needed to attain water quality standards(i.e.,water <br /> quality goals to protect aquatic life, drinking water,and other beneficial uses). The Clean Water Act Section <br /> 303(d) established the TMDL program to guide application of State standards to individual water <br /> bodies/watersheds. The process has three steps: <br /> ► Identify Quality Limited Waters. California must identify and prepare a list [303(d) list] of waters that do <br /> not or are not expected to meet water quality standards after applying existing required controls. <br /> ► Establish Priority Waters/Watersheds.California must prioritize waters/watersheds and target high priority <br /> waters/watersheds for TMDL development. <br /> ► Develop TMDLs.For each listed water body, California must develop a TMDL that would describe load <br /> reductions necessary to achieve water quality standards, allowing for seasonal variations and an appropriate <br /> margin of safety.A TMDL is a quantitative assessment of water quality problems, contributing sources, and <br /> load reductions or control actions needed to restore and protect individual water bodies. <br /> The State Water Resources Control Board(SWRCB) and the nine Regional Boards are the state agencies <br /> responsible for implementing the TMDL program in California. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency <br /> (EPA)provides federal oversight to the process by reviewing and approving both the 303(d) list of quality limited <br /> waters and each TMDL. If EPA disapproves lists or TMDLs,EPA is required to establish the lists and/or TMDLs. <br /> TMDLs should address all significant sources of listed pollutants, including point sources,nonpoint sources, and <br /> naturally occurring sources.A TMDL is the sum of the individual waste load allocations for point sources,load <br /> allocations for nonpoint sources and natural background pollutants, and an appropriate margin of safety. TMDLs <br /> must clearly identify the links between the water body use impairment and threat of concern,the causes of the <br /> impairment or threat, and the load reductions or actions needed to remedy or prevent the impairment. TMDLs are <br /> developed to provide an analytical basis for implementing pollution controls, land management practices, and <br /> restoration projects needed to protect water quality. The State of California is required to include approved <br /> TMDLs and associated implementation measures in its state water quality management plans, i.e.,Basin Plans. <br /> USEPA regulations require that NPDES permits be consistent with waste load allocations in approved TMDLs. <br /> Manteca WQCF and Collection System Master Plans EIR EDAW <br /> City of Manteca 5-7 Cumulative Impacts <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.