Laserfiche WebLink
5.3.5 PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES <br /> Cumulative impacts to paleontological resources are based on analysis of past,present, and reasonably <br /> foreseeable future actions in the vicinity of the proposed project in combination with potential effects of <br /> implementing the project. Paleontological resources in project area and vicinity would be located within <br /> sediments of the Modesto Formation,which is a rock unit of high paleontological sensitivity under the Society of <br /> Vertebrate Paleontology guidelines. A vertebrate fossil site at Littlejohns Creek(UCMP V-5107)has been <br /> recorded in sediments of the Modesto Formation within two miles of the project area. This site yielded 7 <br /> specimens from Rancholabrean-age Columbian mammoth,horse, and an unidentified carnivore.Another <br /> vertebrate fossil specimen(Rancholabrean-age Columbian mammoth)was recovered from sediments of the <br /> Modesto Formation in the City of Lathrop, 3 miles west of the WQCF site. Previous development activities <br /> disturbed,destroyed,or compromised numerous paleontological resources. This would be a cumulatively <br /> significant impact. However,because no significant paleontological resources have been identified within the <br /> project area,the project's incremental contribution would not be considerable and this would be less-than- <br /> significant cumulative impact. <br /> 5.3.9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY <br /> SURFACE WATER QUALITY <br /> The proposed project and other related projects would require use of a storm water pollution prevention plan to <br /> ensure compliance with future applicable storm water discharge permits. These and related actions (e.g., <br /> implementation of BMPs)that would be taken would ensure that future construction and operation of the WQCF <br /> facilities and control of stormwater runoff would result in less-than-significant cumulative stormwater quality <br /> impacts in adjacent water bodies. <br /> Numerous future projects, actions, and programs will be implemented over the next 20 years that will affect Delta <br /> water quality. Key factors that will affect further Delta water quality include,but are not necessarily limited to the <br /> following: <br /> ► Urban growth and other land use changes and associated runoff, <br /> ► Agricultural practices and regulations intended to control agricultural pollutant runoff, <br /> ► System-wide hydrology as affected by diversions and Central Valley Project/State Water Project operations, <br /> ► Mine drainage controls, and <br /> ► Point-source discharges. <br /> The collective effects on surface water quality within the project vicinity(i.e.,downstream of the outfall)is not <br /> possible to know at this point.While some water quality effects may be adverse, a number of regulatory programs <br /> (as discussed above)will improve water quality. Although there are numerous ongoing and fixture State programs <br /> that are intended to improve Delta water quality,planned and approved growth will continue to occur in the <br /> Sacramento metropolitan area and communities throughout the Sacramento River and Delta watersheds over the <br /> next two decades. The increase in size of the urban area will likely lead to increased discharges of treated <br /> wastewater to the San Joaquin River and Delta, increased urban runoff, and possibly greater volumes of storm <br /> water runoff due to increased amounts of impervious area within the watershed. Programs and regulations that <br /> affect water quality are becoming increasingly stringent,which may offset, in whole or in part,these changes. <br /> Also,project-specific urban runoff and storm water discharge mitigation measures will be required as planned <br /> growth occurs. <br /> It should be acknowledged that the regulatory system under the CWA is geared to prevent significant adverse <br /> changes in water quality. Further,TMDL programs are intended to result in net reductions in pollutant <br /> concentrations that exceed the"assimilative capacity"of the affected waterway. Thus, it could be argued that <br /> regulatory requirements will result in improved water quality in the future for listed parameters in listed water <br /> EDAW Manteca WQCF and Collection System Master Plans EIR <br /> Cumulative Impacts 5-16 City of Manteca <br />