My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
2450
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506303
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2020 5:02:58 PM
Creation date
7/23/2020 4:33:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
RECORD_ID
PR0506303
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0001086
FACILITY_NAME
MANTECA PUBLIC WORKS
STREET_NUMBER
2450
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
24130050
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2450 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
736
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
began in 1959 and since then the WQCF has undergone several major expansions. The objectives of the proposed <br /> project are: <br /> ► provide sufficient conveyance and treatment capacity to meet projected growth within the City of Manteca's <br /> WQCF service area through the year 2023; <br /> ► provide for orderly and cost-effective expansion of City WQCF facilities and conveyance systems; <br /> ► comply with current water quality standards and provide flexibility to address changes in standards and <br /> regulations; and <br /> ► address community concerns in relation to the planning, design, construction, and operation of City WQCF <br /> and collection system facilities and programs. <br /> The existing WQCF and wastewater collection system constitute a large-scale wastewater collection,treatment, <br /> and disposal system,representing a substantial public investment. The WQCF is located on 210 acres of land <br /> surrounded by areas that are undergoing rapid urbanization. The relatively large project site provides sufficient <br /> land for the treatment facility and its proposed expansion,plus a buffer from urbanizing land uses. It is located at <br /> the terminus of several trunk sewers that convey sewage from all areas of the city,and this also represents a <br /> substantial public investment. This substantial public investment(represented by existing facilities),the <br /> urbanizing nature of the area, and the location of wastewater conveyance and effluent outfall pipelines all serve to <br /> limit feasible alternatives. An alternative location for the plant is not feasible. The project also provides a crucial <br /> need: collection,treatment and disposal of wastewater for over 63,000 people. Consequently, alternatives to the <br /> project are limited to how the wastewater is treated,how it is disposed, and the location of wastewater collection <br /> system, effluent outfall, and recycled water distribution system pipelines and facilities. <br /> As a practical matter, only three general options are available for wastewater disposal: wastewater may be treated <br /> and discharged to surface waters;treated and discharged to land; or treated, stored,and reused for landscape <br /> irrigation,agricultural irrigation,wetland creation or enhancement, or other uses. The City currently treats <br /> wastewater for discharge to the San Joaquin River,with a small(0.87 mgd)on-site agricultural land application <br /> component. <br /> 7.3 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS <br /> Based on the above discussion,the City identified and this EIR evaluates four alternatives to the proposed project: <br /> No Project Alternative (9.87 mgd); Increased Land Disposal Alternative; Advanced Wastewater Treatment <br /> Alternative; and Modified Pipeline Alignment Alternative. Other alternatives were considered, including an off- <br /> site location and an offsets alternative. These other alternatives are discussed in Section 7.4, "Alternatives <br /> Eliminated from Detailed Consideration."The Modified Pipeline Alignment Alternative focuses on impacts <br /> associated with wastewater collection system,treated effluent outfall, and recycled water distribution system <br /> pipelines. <br /> Each of the four alternatives to the proposed project is analyzed below. For each alternative, a description of the <br /> alternative is followed by an analysis of impacts. The impact analyses are primarily qualitative. To avoid <br /> unnecessary redundancy in the analysis, summary statements have been provided whenever possible to indicate <br /> whether the impacts of the alternative under consideration are greater than, similar to, or less than those of the <br /> project. <br /> 7.3.1 NO PROJECT ALTERNATIVE (9.57 MGD <br /> Under the No Project Alternative (9.87 mgd),the 2007 WQCF and 2006 collection system master plans would not <br /> be implemented, and discharge at the WQCF would not exceed the currently permitted discharge rate of 9.87 <br /> EDAW Manteca WQCF and Collection System Master Plans EIR <br /> Alternatives to the Proposed Project 7-2 City of Manteca <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.