Laserfiche WebLink
Benefits...........................................................................................................................104 Table 8: Sources of Surface Water Quality Data used in Near-Field and Far-Field Analyses....25 <br /> Potential Impacts.............................................................................................................104 Table 9: Hydrologic Classification of Years 1990 through 2006 by Water Year Type..............28 <br /> Compliance with Laws and Regulations.........................................................................105 Table 10: Projected WQCF Effluent Quality after Phase III Expansion.....................................31 <br /> Socio-Economic Impacts of Alternatives for Maintaining Existing Water Quality...............105 Table 11: Estimated Impact of Biochemical Oxygen Demand from WQCF Discharge in the San <br /> Impacts on Monthly Residential Sewer Rates....................................................................106 Joaquin River at WQCF R-3.................................................................................................35 <br /> Socio-Economic Impacts to the WQCF Service Area........................................................107 Table 12: Estimated Impact of Total Suspended Solids from WQCF Discharge in the San <br /> Joaquin River at WQCF R-3.................................................................................................37 <br /> Projected Increases in WQCF Residential Rates with Implementation of Alternative Table 13: Estimated Impact of Total Aluminum from WQCF Discharge in the San Joaquin <br /> ControlMeasures............................................................................................................107 <br /> Riverat WQCF R-3..............................................................................................................40 <br /> Modeling of Economic Impacts on the Community.......................................................108 Table 14: Estimated Impact of Electrical Conductivity during April through August from <br /> Balance of Environmental Benefits and Socio-Economic Considerations.............................113 WQCF Discharge in the San Joaquin River at WQCF R-3..................................................43 <br /> No Project Alternative........................................................................................................116 Table 15: Estimated Impact of Electrical Conductivity during September through March from <br /> Effluent-to-Land Disposal Alternative...............................................................................117 WQCF Discharge in the San Joaquin River at WQCF R-3..................................................43 <br /> Reverse Osmosis Treatment Alternative............................................................................118 Table 16: Estimated Impact of Ammonia(as Nitrogen)from WQCF Discharge during June <br /> Proposed Project.................................................................................................................118 through September in the San Joaquin River at WQCF R-3................................................46 <br /> Table 17: Estimated Impact of Ammonia(as Nitrogen)from WQCF Discharge during October <br /> Project Identified as Providing Maximum Benefit to the State..........................................119 through May in the San Joaquin River at WQCF R-3..........................................................46 <br /> Evaluation of Consistency with Antidegradation Policy.......................................................121 Table 18: Estimated Impact of Dissolved Arsenic from WQCF Discharge in the San Joaquin <br /> Consistency with Antidegradation Policies............................................................................121 River at WQCF R-3..............................................................................................................48 <br /> References..................................................................................................................................123 Table 19: Estimated Impact of Dissolved Copper from WQCF Discharge in the San Joaquin <br /> Appendix A: Diffuser Temperature Increment Analysis.....................................................126 River at WQCF R-3..............................................................................................................50 <br /> Table 20: Estimated Impact of Total Cyanide from WQCF Discharge in the San Joaquin River <br /> Appendix B: Streeter-Phelps Dissolved Oxygen Analysis....................................................127 at WQCF R-3........................................................................................................................52 <br /> Table 21: Estimated Impact of Dissolved Iron from WQCF Discharge in the San Joaquin River <br /> Listof Tables at WQCF R-3........................................................................................................................54 <br /> Table 22: Estimated Impact of Dissolved Manganese from WQCF Discharge in the San Joaquin <br /> Table 1: Beneficial Uses Designated for the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta.....................7 River at WQCF R-3..............................................................................................................56 <br /> Table 2: Applicable Water Quality Objectives and/or Criteria for the San Joaquin River and Table 23: Estimated Impact of Methylene Blue Active Substances from WQCF Discharge in the <br /> Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta...............................................................................................8 San Joaquin River at WQCF R-3..........................................................................................58 <br /> Table 3: 2006 Clean Water Act Section 303(d)Listed Constituents as they pertain to Table 24: Estimated Impact of Nitrate(as Nitrogen)from WQCF Discharge in the San Joaquin <br /> Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Waterways..........................................................................10 River at WQCF R-3..............................................................................................................60 <br /> Table 4: Potential Sources and Proposed TMDL Completion Dates of Pollutants/Stressors for Table 25: Estimated Impact of Nitrite(as Nitrogen)from WQCF Discharge in the San Joaquin <br /> Select Delta Waterways contained in 2006 Clean Water Act Section 303(d)List...............11 River at WQCF R-3..............................................................................................................62 <br /> Table 5: Adopted Effluent Limits for WQCF's Discharge to the San Joaquin River at a 9.87 Table 26: Estimated Impact of Total Mercury from WQCF Discharge in the San Joaquin River <br /> MGD(ADWF)Design Treatment Capacity.........................................................................13 at WQCF R-3........................................................................................................................64 <br /> Table 6: Sources and Percent Contributions of Flow and TDS in the San Joaquin River at Table 27: Summary of Percent Cross Section Elevated VF or more during Winter Dry Water <br /> Vernalis(1985—1994).........................................................................................................18 Year Flowrates(RMA 2006)................................................................................................66 <br /> Table 7: Water Quality Constituents Identified for Near-Field and Far-Field Analyses.............23 <br /> City of Manteca Antidegradation Analysis v June 2007 City of Manteca Antidegradation Analysis vi June 2007 <br />