Laserfiche WebLink
Figure 10: Projected Change in San Joaquin River Ammonia(as Nitrogen)Concentration at Figure 29: Frequency Plots of WQCF Contribution at the Central Valley Project(CVP)Delta <br /> WQCF R-3 during June through September with increasing WCQF Effluent Flowrate.....44 Mendota Canal Intake for Critical and Dry/Below Normal Water Years............................84 <br /> Figure 11: Projected Change in San Joaquin River Ammonia(as Nitrogen)Concentration at Figure 30: Frequency Plots of WQCF Contribution at the Contra Costa Water District Intake at <br /> WQCF R-3 during October through May with increasing WQCF Effluent Flowrate.........45 Rock Slough for Critical and Dry/Below Normal Water Years...........................................85 <br /> Figure 12: Projected Change in San Joaquin River Dissolved Arsenic Concentration at WQCF Figure 31: Frequency Plots of WQCF Contribution at the Contra Costa Water District Intake at <br /> R-3 with increasing WQCF Effluent Flowrate.....................................................................47 Old River for Critical and Dry/Below Normal Water Years................................................86 <br /> Figure 13: Projected Change in San Joaquin River Dissolved Copper Concentration at WQCF Figure 32: Frequency Plots of WQCF Contribution in the San Joaquin River at Navigation Light <br /> R-3 with increasing WQCF Effluent Flowrate.....................................................................49 18 for Critical and Dry/Below Normal Water Years............................................................87 <br /> Figure 14: Projected Change in San Joaquin River Total Cyanide Concentration at WQCF R-3 Figure 33: Frequency Plots of WQCF Contribution in the San Joaquin River at the Stockton <br /> with increasing WQCF Effluent Flowrate............................................................................51 Ship Channel Turning Basin for Critical and Dry/Below Normal Water Years..................88 <br /> Figure 15: Projected Change in San Joaquin River Dissolved Iron Concentration at WQCF R-3 Figure 34: Projection of Percent Contributions Back to Conditions of Modeled Critical Water <br /> with increasing WQCF Effluent Flowrate............................................................................53 Year(1991/1992)..................................................................................................................90 <br /> Figure 16: Projected Change in San Joaquin River Dissolved Manganese Concentration at <br /> WQCF R-3 with increasing WQCF Effluent Flowrate.........................................................55 <br /> Figure 17: Projected Change in San Joaquin River Methylene Blue Active Substances <br /> Concentration at WQCF R-3 with increasing WQCF Effluent Flowrate.............................57 <br /> Figure 18: Projected Change in San Joaquin River Nitrate(as Nitrogen)Concentration at WQCF <br /> R-3 with increasing WQCF Effluent Flowrate.....................................................................59 <br /> Figure 19: Projected Change in San Joaquin River Nitrite(as Nitrogen)Concentration at WQCF <br /> R-3 with increasing WQCF Effluent Flowrate.....................................................................61 <br /> Figure 20: Projected Change in San Joaquin River Total Mercury Concentration at WQCF R-3 <br /> with increasing WQCF Effluent Flowrate............................................................................63 <br /> Figure 21: Comparison of Winter Surface Water Temperatures for Dry Water Year Flowrates at <br /> (A)9.87 MGD(ADWF)and(B)27 MGD(ADWF). Discharge is located at 0'on the <br /> Figures...................................................................................................................................67 <br /> Figure 22: Winter Cross Sectional Temperature Differential for Dry Water Year Flowrates at <br /> (A)9.87 MGD(ADWF)and(B)27 MGD WQCF(ADWF)...............................................68 <br /> Figure 23: Ultimate Load of Dissolved Oxygen Demand from the WQCF for increasing ADWF <br /> (San Joaquin River DO Demand Load at Rl is 92,600 lbs/b at 1,250 cfs)..........................73 <br /> Figure 24: EDAW 2000 Calculated Change in DWSC DO and Corresponding Regression <br /> Model....................................................................................................................................74 <br /> Figure 25: Monthly Minimum Dissolved Oxygen from Streeter-Phelps Analysis of San Joaquin <br /> River and WQCF Discharge.................................................................................................78 <br /> Figure 26: Finite Element Mesh of Simulated Waterways for Far-Field Simulations(RMA <br /> 2006).....................................................................................................................................80 <br /> Figure 27:Select Locations within the Delta Considered in the Far Field Analysis(RMA 2006) <br /> ...............................................................................................................................................81 <br /> Figure 28: Frequency Plots of WQCF Contribution at the State Water Project(SWP)Intake at <br /> Clifton Court for Critical and Dry/Below Normal Water Years...........................................83 <br /> City of Manteca Antidegradation Analysis 1X June 2007 City of Manteca Antidegradation Analysis X June 2007 <br />