Laserfiche WebLink
Electrical Conductivity <br /> Electrical Conductivity(Sept.-Mar.) <br /> Data Availability: Manteca WQCF NPDES self-monitoring data from the San Joaquin River at <br /> R-1(just upstream of the WQCF discharge)corresponding to dry/below normal water years were 1200 <br /> used to calculate an estimated impact of WQCF effluent EC in the San Joaquin River under > 1000 <br /> critical(600 cfs)and dry/below normal(1250 cfs)river flows at a permitted discharge of 9.87 t— SJR Flows <br /> MGD(ADWF)and at proposed discharges of 17.5 MGD(ADWF)and 27 MGD(ADWF). 800 600 cfs <br /> Improved WQCF treatment processes are projected to produce treated effluent having an average 0 600 1250 cts <br /> EC of 825µmhos/cm. Eapp- _WQC` <br /> Results: The effect of an increase in WQCF discharge from 9.87 MGD(ADWF)to 27 MGD v 200 <br /> (ADWF)is appropriately addressed in the receiving water at well-mixed conditions downstream w 0 <br /> of the discharge. Due to the seasonal EC objectives contained in the Basin Plan,available 9.87 17.5 27 <br /> ambient EC data were divided into two groups for the purpose of the present near-field analysis: WQCF Effluent Flow Rate(MGD) <br /> an April through August data set,and a September through March data set. During critical and <br /> dry/below normal San Joaquin River flow conditions,an increase in WQCF effluent discharge <br /> will produce a minor increase in EC in the San Joaquin River downstream of the discharge Figure 9: Projected Change in San Joaquin River Electrical Conductivity at WQCF R-3 during <br /> during April through August relative to its seasonal objective of 700µmhos/cm,and will September through March with increasing WQCF Effluent Flowrate <br /> produce a slight increase in EC in the river during September through March relative to its <br /> seasonal objective of 1000µmhos/cm. These incremental increases in river EC observed when Comparison to Water Ouality Objective: The Basin Plan for the Delta establishes seasonal <br /> evaluating the April through August(agricultural season)and September through March(non- EC objectives in the San Joaquin River and southern Delta of 700µmhos/cm(April–August) <br /> agricultural season)time periods are shown in Figure 8 and Table 14,and Figure 9 and Table and 1000µmhos/cm(September–March). Estimated EC in the San Joaquin River under critical <br /> 15,respectively. and dry/below normal flow conditions shows a minor increase during April through August <br /> relative to the 700µmhos/cm objective,and a slight increase during September through March <br /> Electrical Conductivity(Apr.-Aug.) relative to the 1000µmhos/cm objective,with an increase in WQCF effluent discharge from 9.87 <br /> MGD(ADWF)to 27 MGD(ADWF). Under both seasonal EC objective scenarios(see Figure 8 <br /> 800 and Figure 9)the projected median EC in the San Joaquin River is well below the seasonally- <br /> 700- relevant Basin Plan EC objective. <br /> r+^600 SJR Flows <br /> o E Evaluation: Salinity control issues in the Delta have been reviewed and addressed by the State <br /> c0 500 ri 600 cfs Water Board as far back as 1991,as described in the 1991 Delta Plan(SWRCB,1991). <br /> 0 400 ri 1250 cfs Subsequent State Water Board analyses of elevated salinity in the southern Delta presented in the <br /> E 300 WQO 1995 Bay-Delta Plan(SWRCB,1995)and Revised Water Right Decision 1641(SWRCB,2000) <br /> 13 200 conclude that salinity problems in the southern Delta are the result of many inter-related <br /> w 100 0 litconditions,including water diversions upstream of the Delta,water diversions within the Delta <br /> 9.87 17.5 27 for export and local use,high levels of salinity in irrigation return flows discharged to the Delta <br /> waterways and tributaries,groundwater inflow,seasonal flow variation,and tidal conditions. <br /> WQCF Effluent Flow Rate(MGD) Although discharge of treated wastewater to the Delta or its tributaries under an NPDES permit <br /> can marginally affect EC in the southern Delta,previous State Water Board decisions and water <br /> quality control plans do not mention or consider treated effluent discharges as a source of salinity <br /> Figure 8: Projected Change in San Joaquin River Electrical Conductivity at WQCF R-3 during <br /> April through August with increasing WQCF Effluent Flowrate in the southern Delta(SWRCB,2005). <br /> In regard to the present analysis,the incremental change in EC in the San Joaquin River due to <br /> an increase in WQCF effluent discharged from the current permitted rate(9.87 MGD(ADWF)) <br /> to the proposed rate(27 MGD(ADWF))is minor during the months of April through August <br /> (agricultural season)relative to the 700µmhos/cm objective,and slight during the months of <br /> September through March(non-agricultural season)relative to the 1000µmhos/em objective. <br /> City of Manteca Antidegradation Analysis 41 June 2007 City of Manteca Antidegradation Analysis 42 June 2007 <br />