My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
2450
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506303
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2020 5:02:58 PM
Creation date
7/23/2020 4:33:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
RECORD_ID
PR0506303
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0001086
FACILITY_NAME
MANTECA PUBLIC WORKS
STREET_NUMBER
2450
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
24130050
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2450 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
736
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
effluent ammonia levels on DO levels in the San Joaquin River is addressed in the Far-Field <br /> Ammonia as Nitrogen(Oct.-May) Analysis and Results section of this report in a discussion of far-field DO impacts. Additionally, <br /> it should be noted that ammonia levels will decline over time and distance downstream of R-3 as <br /> 6 ammonia is utilized by phytoplankton and other primary producers. <br /> J <br /> 5 SJR Flows <br /> E 4 Table 16: Estimated Impact of Ammonia(as Nitrogen)from WQCF Discharge during June through <br /> �600 cfs September in the San Joaquin River at WQCF R-3 <br /> 3 �1250 cfs <br /> c11 <br /> 2 -Acute WQO Ammonia as Nitrogen(June-Sept.) San Joaquin River Manteca WQCF Effluent <br /> c 1 R-1 50"%concen.(mg/L)* 0.13 Flowrate(cfs) Flowrate(MGD ADWF) <br /> v Projected effluent concen.(mg/L) 1 1.5 600 1250 9.87 17.5 27 <br /> 0 <br /> 9.87 17.5 27 Est.mass loading(lbs/day) 420 876 123 219 338 <br /> WQCF Effluent Flow Rate(MGD) Est.downstream R-3 river concentration(mg/L)at 600 cfs 0.16 0.19 0.22 <br /> Est.downstream R-3 river concentration(mg/L)at 1250 cfs 0.15 0.16 0.17 <br /> `50"percentile statistic calculated using the following data set: <br /> Figure 11: Projected Change in San Joaquin River Ammonia(as Nitrogen)Concentration at Data Period:June 2002-September 2002,September 2004;Sample Size,n=5;Percent Detected Data=80% <br /> WQCF R-3 during October through May with increasing WQCF Effluent Flowrate <br /> Comparison to Water Ouality Objective: The U.S.EPA ambient water quality criteria that are Table 17: Estimated Impact of Ammonia(as Nitrogen)from WQCF Discharge during October <br /> applied to ammonia concentrations in the San Joaquin River are pH and temperature dependent. through May in the San Joaquin River at WQCF R-3 <br /> The acute and chronic criteria for ammonia as promulgated by U.S.EPA 1999 Update of Ammonia as Nitrogen(Oct.-May) San Joaquin River Manteca WQCF Effluent <br /> Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Ammonia are used by the Regional Water Board to interpret " Flowrate(cis) Flowrate(MGD ADWF) <br /> the Basin Plan's narrative toxicity objective. Using pH and temperature values previously used R-1 50 %concen.(mg/L)* 0.08 <br /> by the Regional Water Board in WDR Order No.R5-2004-0028,a chronic criterion of 0.62 Projected effluent concen.(mg/L) 1.5 600 1250 9.87 17.5 27 <br /> mg/L ammonia(as nitrogen)can be calculated and applied to the San Joaquin River during June Est.mass loading(lbs/day) 259 539 123 219 338 <br /> through September based on an ambient pH of 8.4 standard units and an ambient temperature of Est.downstream R-3 river concentration(mg/L)at 600 cfs 0.12 0.14 0.17 <br /> 26°C. Similarly,an acute criterion of 5.62 mg/L ammonia(as nitrogen)can be calculated and Est.downstream R-3 river concentration(mg/L)at 1250 cfs 0.10 0.11 0.13 <br /> applied to the San Joaquin River during October through May based on an ambient pH of 8.0 '50'"percentile statistic calculated using the following data set: <br /> standard units. The acute ammonia criterion is not temperature dependent. Estimated Data Period:January 2002-May 2002,October 2002-May 2004;Sample Size,n=11;Percent Detected Data=72.7% <br /> concentrations of ammonia(as nitrogen)in the San Joaquin River under critical and dry/below <br /> normal flow conditions show a more pronounced increase relative to the chronic EPA criterion <br /> during June through September,than the slight increase relative to the acute EPA criterion <br /> during October through May,with an increase in WQCF effluent discharge from 9.87 MGD <br /> (ADWF)to 27 MGD(ADWF). In an analysis of compliance with chronic and acute seasonal <br /> objectives(Figure 10 and Figure 11),projected median ammonia(as nitrogen)concentrations in <br /> the San Joaquin River remain below the more stringent chronic ammonia objective(0.62 mg/L) <br /> calculated for the river on a year round basis. <br /> Evaluation: A high level of nitrogen removal will be accomplished through the activated sludge <br /> nitrification-denitrification process implemented as one of several treatment process <br /> improvements associated with the WQCF upgrade. Most importantly,the present analysis shows <br /> that projected,median ammonia(as nitrogen)concentrations in the San Joaquin River are below <br /> the more stringent chronic criterion of 0.62 mg/L during the June through September time <br /> period,and substantially lower than the acute criterion of 5.62 mg/L during the October through <br /> May time period. The consumptive oxygen demands of ammonia nitrification are most strongly <br /> expressed downstream of the City's wastewater outfall,and therefore the impact of WQCF <br /> City of Manteca Antidegradation Analysis 45 June 2007 City of Manteca Antidegradation Analysis 46 June 2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.