Laserfiche WebLink
WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS ORDER NO.R5-2004-0028 -45- WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS ORDER NO.R5-2004-0028 -46- <br /> CITY OF MANTECA,CITY OF LATHROP AND DUTRA FARMS CITY OF MANTECA,CITY OF LATHROP AND DUTRA FARMS <br /> WASTEWATER QUALITY CONTROL FACILITY WASTEWATER QUALITY CONTROL FACILITY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> 5. There are indications that elevated temperatures in the San Joaquin River may affect If after review of the study results it is determined that the discharge has reasonable <br /> migrating Chinook salmon and other fish during portions of the year. Temperature potential to cause or contribute to an exceedance of a water quality objective this Order <br /> objectives in the Basin Plan and the Thermal Plan may not address the temperature will be reopened and effluent limitations added for the subject constituents. <br /> parameters necessary to protect migrating fish. To evaluate the effect of a thermal <br /> temperature discharge to migrating fish,the Discharger shall conduct a comprehensive The Discharger shall submit to the Regional Board on or before each compliance due date, <br /> study of the effect of its thermal discharge to migrating fish in the vicinity of the discharge the specified document or a written report detailing compliance or noncompliance with the <br /> (with particular attention being paid to those periods when River flow is lowest and/or specific date and task. If noncompliance is reported,the Discharger shall state the reasons <br /> River or effluent temperature are highest). The Discharger shall perform the study in for noncompliance and include an estimate of the date when the Discharger will be in <br /> consultation with the Department of Fish and Game,United States Environmental compliance. The Discharger shall notify the Regional Board by letter when it returns to <br /> Protection Agency,National Marine Fisheries Service,United States Fish and Wildlife compliance with the time schedule. <br /> Service,and other interested parties. <br /> 8. To determine compliance with the Groundwater Limitations,the groundwater monitoring <br /> A work plan for this study shall be completed and submitted to the Executive Officer by network shall include one or more background monitoring wells and a sufficient number of <br /> 1 September 2004. The work plan shall include a schedule for completing all work in designated monitoring wells downgradient of every treatment,storage,and disposal unit <br /> accordance with the work plan within eighteen(18)months following work plan approval that does or may release waste constituents to groundwater. All monitoring wells shall <br /> by the Executive Officer. Also,a progress report shall be submitted every six(6)months comply with the appropriate standards as described in California Well Standards Bulletin <br /> after approval of the work plan. The permit may be reopened after review of the study to 74-90(June 199 1)and Water Well Standards:State of California Bulletin 94-81 <br /> incorporate Regional Board findings and requirements as appropriate. (December 1981),and any more stringent standards adopted by the Discharger or County <br /> pursuant to California Water Code Section 13801. <br /> 6. Pollution Prevention Plan: The Discharger shall prepare a pollution prevention plan <br /> following California Water Code 13263.3(d)(3)for mercury. A work plan and time The Discharger,after one year of monitoring,shall characterize natural background quality <br /> schedule for preparation of the pollution prevention plan shall be completed and submitted of monitored constituents in a technical report,to be submitted by 1 May 2005. For each <br /> to the Executive Officer for approval by 1 August 2004. The Pollution Prevention Plan groundwater monitoring parameter/constituent identified in the Monitoring and Reporting <br /> shall be completed and submitted to the Regional Board by 1 August 2005. A progress Program,the report shall present a summary of monitoring data,calculation of the <br /> report shall be submitted every six(6)months after submittal of the work plan. Based on a concentration in background monitoring wells,and a comparison of background <br /> review of the submitted information,this Order may be reopened for addition and/or groundwater quality to that in wells used to monitor the facility. Determination of <br /> modification of limitations and requirements for these constituents. background quality shall be made using the methods described in Title 27 California Code <br /> of Regulations Section 20415(e)(10),and shall be based on data from at least four <br /> The Discharger shall submit to the Regional Board,on or before each compliance due date, consecutive quarterly(or more frequent)groundwater monitoring events. For each <br /> the specified document or a written report detailing compliance or noncompliance with the monitoring parameter/constituent,the report shall compare measured concentrations for <br /> specific date and task. If noncompliance is reported,the Discharger shall state the reasons compliance monitoring wells with the calculated background concentration. <br /> for noncompliance and include an estimate of the date when the Discharger will be in <br /> compliance. The Discharger shall notify the Regional Board by letter when it returns to If the monitoring shows that any constituent concentrations are increased above <br /> compliance with the time schedule. background water quality,the Discharger shall submit a technical report describing the <br /> evaluations results and critiquing each evaluated component with respect to BPCT and <br /> 7. SIP Study: The discharge may contain dioxins that have a reasonable potential to cause or minimizing the discharge's impact on groundwater quality. In no case shall the discharge <br /> contribute to an exceedance of water quality objectives. The Discharger shall comply with be allowed to exceed a water quality objective. This Order may be reopened and additional <br /> the following time schedule in conducting a study of these constituents potential effect in groundwater limitations added. <br /> surface waters: <br /> 9. By 31 March 2006,the Discharger shall submit a Sanitary Sewer System Operation, <br /> Task Comnliance Date Maintenance,Overflow Prevention,and Response Plan(SSS Plan)that describes the <br /> Submit Study Report for Dioxins 1 November 2004 actions designed to prevent,or minimize the potential for sanitary sewer overflows. The <br /> Discharger shall maintain the SSS Plan in an up-to-date condition and shall amend the SSS <br /> Plan whenever there is a change(e.g.in the design,construction,operation,or maintenance <br /> of the sanitary sewer system or sewer facilities)that materially affects the potential for <br />