My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
2450
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506303
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2020 5:02:58 PM
Creation date
7/23/2020 4:33:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
RECORD_ID
PR0506303
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0001086
FACILITY_NAME
MANTECA PUBLIC WORKS
STREET_NUMBER
2450
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
24130050
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2450 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
736
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INFORMATION SHEET ORDER NO.R5-2004-0028 7 INFORMATION SHEET ORDER NO.R5-2004-0028 8 <br /> CITY OF MANTECA,CITY OF LATHROP AND DUTRA FARMS CITY OF MANTECA,CITY OF LATHROP AND DUTRA FARMS <br /> WASTEWATER QUALITY CONTROL FACILITY WASTEWATER QUALITY CONTROL FACILITY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> b. The degradation after effective source control,treatment,and control is limited to waste 6 Thermal Limitations <br /> constituents typically encountered in municipal wastewater as specified in the groundwater <br /> limitations in this Order; The State Water Resources Control Board(State Board)Water Quality Control Plan for Control of <br /> c. The Discharger minimizes the degradation by fully implementing,regularly maintaining,and Temperatures in Coastal and Interstate Waters and Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California(the <br /> optimally operating best practicable control technology(BPCT)measures;and Thermal Plan)is applicable to this discharge. The Thermal Plan requires that such a discharge: <br /> d. The degradation does not result in water quality less than that prescribed in the Basin Plan,e.g., (a) shall not exceed the receiving water temperature by more than 20°F; <br /> does not exceed water quality objectives. <br /> (b) shall not create a zone,defined by water temperatures of more than 1°F above natural <br /> Monitoring of the groundwater must be conducted to determine if the discharge has caused an increase receiving water temperature which exceeds 25%of the cross sectional area of the River <br /> in constituent concentrations,when compared to background. The monitoring must,at a minimum, at any point;and, <br /> require a complete assessment of groundwater impacts including an assessment of all wastewater- (c) shall not cause a temperature rise greater than 4°F above the natural temperature of the <br /> related constituents which may have migrated to groundwater,the vertical and lateral extent of any receiving waters at any time or place. <br /> degradation,and an analysis of whether additional or different methods of treatment or control of the <br /> discharge are necessary to provide best practicable treatment or control to comply with Resolution 68- For the purposes of compliance with the Thermal Plan,the Discharger is considered to be an existing <br /> 16. Economic analysis is only one of many factors considered in determining best practicable discharger of elevated temperature waste. Monitoring by the Discharger indicates that the 20 degree°F <br /> treatment. If monitoring indicates that the discharge has incrementally increased constituent limitation of Objective 5.A.(1)a of the Thermal Plan is occasionally exceeded in winter months when <br /> concentrations in groundwater above background,this permit may be reopened and modified. Until the receiving water is at its lowest temperatures. Modeling conducted by RMA,subject to the <br /> groundwater monitoring is sufficient,this Order contains Groundwater Limitations that allow limitations discussed below,indicates that the current and the expanded flows with continuous <br /> groundwater quality to be degraded for certain constituents when compared to background discharge exceed both the 1 degree and 4 degree requirements of Objectives 5.A.(1)b and 5.A.(1)c of <br /> groundwater quality,but not to exceed water quality objectives or standards. If groundwater quality is the Thermal Plan. The modeling also demonstrates that a timed discharge,that is,discharging only on <br /> shown to have been degraded by the wastewater treatment processes or the discharge,the incremental the outgoing tide,for the increased flow exceeds only the 4 degree requirement,but not the 1 degree <br /> change in pollutant concentration(when compared with background)may not be increased. This requirement. The Discharger has requested an exception to the 4 degree requirement of Objective <br /> Order may also be reopened and specific numeric limitations established. 5.A.(I)c of the Thermal Plan which requires that the discharge shall not cause a surface water <br /> The discharge authorized herein and the treatment and storage facilities associated with the discharge temperature rise greater than 4°F above the natural temperature of the receiving waters at any time or <br /> of treated municipal wastewater,except for discharges of residual sludge and solid waste,are exempt place and has also requested a one month averaging period to meet the 20 degree limit of Objective <br /> from the requirements of Title 27,CCR,Section 20005 et seq.(hereafter Title 27). The exemption, 5.A.(I)a. An exception cannot be authorized at this time due to a number of factors. First,the <br /> pursuant to Title 27,CCR,Section 20090(a),is based on the following: accuracy of the temperature model results which are the basis for the receiving water limitation <br /> violations are questionable due to a lack of site data to calibrate and validate the model,the lack of <br /> a. The waste consists primarily of domestic sewage and treated effluent; accounting for atmospheric heat gains and loss from the proposed holding pond and the river,the lack <br /> of accounting for tidal cycles and recirculation from the limited model run time,and the lack of <br /> b. The waste discharge requirements are consistent with water quality objectives;and accounting for the Brown Sand,Inc.discharge adjacent to the City's discharge.Second,the Discharger <br /> has not conducted regular monitoring of temperature at the outfall as required in its previous permit, <br /> c. The treatment and storage facilities described herein are associated with a municipal and the available information is based on a limited data set which correlates the temperature at the <br /> wastewater treatment plant. plant site and at the outfall. Third,the Discharger has not provided adequate evidence that a 30-day <br /> averaging period for Effluent Limitation B.11.will not cause adverse impacts to aquatic life. Finally, <br /> This Order requires the Discharger to prepare technical and monitoring reports as authorized by the Discharger does not currently have the capability to implement a timed discharge on out-going <br /> California Water Code(CWC)Section 13267. This Order also requires that the Discharger conduct tides. <br /> groundwater monitoring and includes a regular schedule of groundwater monitoring in the attached <br /> Monitoring and Reporting Program. The groundwater monitoring reports are necessary to evaluate Effluent Limitations and Receiving Water Limitations are included to require compliance with the <br /> impacts to waters of the State to assure protection of beneficial uses and compliance with Regional Thermal Plan. If adequate information is developed to support exceptions to the Thermal Plan,this <br /> Board plans and policies,including Resolution 68-16,and to assure compliance with this Order. Order may be reopened to modify limitations for Thermal Plan compliance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.