Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> TABLE 1 -CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED DASxe+ <br /> FOR NO FURTHER ACTION REQUESTS AT UNDERGROUND TANK SITES <br /> Site Name and Location: Five Star Marina(West), 345 N. Yosemite St., Stockton, San Joaquin County(RB(1391135) <br /> y 1. Distance to production wells for municipal, domestic, A 2009 sensitive receptor survey stated no municipal or <br /> agriculture, industry and other uses within 2000 feet of the site. private wells are located within 2,000'of the Site. <br /> y 2. Site maps, to scale, of area impacted showing locations of In May 1986, one 550-gallon gasoline UST was removed. <br /> any former and existing tank systems, excavation contours and <br /> sample locations, boring and monitoring well elevation <br /> contours, gradients, and nearby surface waters, buildings, <br /> streets, and subsurface utilities; <br /> Y 3. Figures depicting lithology(cross section), treatment system Site lithology consists of clay,silt,sand,and gravel to <br /> diagrams; 41', the total depth investigated. <br /> Y 4. Stockpiled soil remaining on-site or off-site disposal(quantity); Approximately 363 tons of excavated soil was <br /> transported to Forward Landfill in Manteca. <br /> Y 5. Monitoring wells remaining on-site, fate; I Four monitoring wells(MW-1 through MW-4)will be properly abandoned. <br /> 6. Tabulated results of all groundwater Depth to groundwater varied from 5'to 9'bgs. Groundwater flow <br /> elevations and depths to water, direction varied from northwest to northeast. Groundwater gradient <br /> varied from 0.0008 to 0.027 ft(ft. . <br /> 7. Tabulated results of all sampling All data adequately tabularized in various reports,including closure report. <br /> and analyses: <br /> FYI Detection limits for confirmation <br /> sampling <br /> �N Lead analyses <br /> 8. Concentration contours of contaminants found and those remaining in soil and The extent of the identified <br /> groundwater, and both on-site and off-site: contamination is shown in applicable <br /> reports. <br /> M Lateral and Y❑Vertical extent of soil contamination <br /> Lateral and Vertical extent of eroundwatercontamination <br /> 9. Zone of influence calculated and assumptions used for subsurface remediation Over-excavation of soil to 15'bgs(below <br /> system and the zone of capture attained for the soil and groundwater remediation water table) was the approved <br /> s stem; remediation. <br /> 10.Reports/information QY Unauthorized Release Form ❑Y QMRs 30 from 1/98 to 10/08 <br /> 10 Well and boring logs 10 PAR � FRP 51 <br /> Other Closure Report(7/09) <br /> Y J 11.Best Available Technology(BAT)used or an explanation for not UST removal, over-excavation, and natural <br /> usi2q BA T- I attenuation. <br /> Uy 12. Reasons why background was<s Minor residual soil and groundwater contamination remain on-site. <br /> ttainable using BAT, <br /> y 13.Mass balance calculation of substance treated The consultant estimates 22.5 gallons of TPH remain in soil and <br /> versus-that remaining, 0.11 gallons of TPH remain in groundwater. <br /> Y 14. Assumptions, parameters, calculations and The consultant stated since residual petroleum hydrocarbons are <br /> model used in risk assessments, and fate and present in saturated soil below the water table at 15'bgs,and with low <br /> transport modeling; groundwater concentrations, conditions onsite do not pose a risk from <br /> vapor intrusion. TPHg exceeds gross contamination and direct <br /> exposure ESLs for soil at 15'bgs, which is below depths normally <br /> associated with direct contact. <br /> Y 15. Rationale why conditions remaining at site Soil and groundwater contamination reportedly are limited in extent. <br /> will not adversely impact water quality, health, or Land use(commercial)is not expected to change in the foreseeable <br /> other beneficial uses;and future. WQGs will be reached in 2 years. <br /> By: JLBj Comments:In May 1986, one 550-gallon gasoline UST was removed from the subject site.Based upon <br /> 30 quarters of groundwater monitoring showing a stable plume with declining concentrations, the limited <br /> Date: extent of contamination remaining in soil and groundwater, no foreseeable changes in land use,and minimal <br /> 5/27/2010 threats from soil vapor intrusion, direct contact,and gross contamination,Regional Board staff concur with <br /> San Joa uin County's Closure Recommendation. <br />