My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006833
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
420
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0537485
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006833
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2020 5:35:40 PM
Creation date
7/27/2020 3:33:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006833
RECORD_ID
PR0537485
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0021568
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER RAINWATER CAR WASH
STREET_NUMBER
420
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
21931206
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
420 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br /> IS May 2001 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 97-0333 <br /> Page 4 of 7 <br /> feet towards the north) at 0 21 feet after 372 minutes of pumping operation (Appendix F) <br /> The maximum ground water draw-down in wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-6 and EW-1 versus the <br /> ' distance of each well from the extraction point were graphed on semi-loganthmic paper, utilizing <br /> the Distance-Drawdown Method(Jacob straight-lune method), general transmissivity, storativity and <br /> hydraulic conductivity values were determined (Appendix H) Ground water levels in observation <br /> wells MW-6, MW-2,MW-3 and MW-1 all appeared to be influenced with measurable draw-down <br /> during the pumping test <br /> ' Utilizing data colIectedfrom well EW-1, MW-1, MW-2, MW-3 and MW-6, a transmissivity value <br /> was calculated at 955_fl/dAy, a storativ ty value calculated at 0 032, a hydraulic conductivity value <br /> of 013 cm/s and a radius of influence projected at 140 feet utilizing a semi-logarithmic plot of <br /> draw-down versus distance (Appendix H and I) Results of the aquifer ground water pumping test <br /> are summarized in Table 1, a site plan depicting the radius of influence during the 05 April 2001 <br /> pumping test is depicted in Figure 5 <br /> • <br /> 32 EXTRACTED WATER SAMPLING PROCEDURES <br /> Approximately 4,100 gallons of purged water were generated during the aquifer ground water <br /> pumping test During the pumping test(4 20 PM, 350 minutes of pumping operation), a grab sample <br /> was collected prior to discharge into the 6,500 gallon Baker tank utilizing three 40-m1 EPA-approved <br /> VOA vials containing 0 5 ml 18% hydrochloric acid as a sample preservative and a one-liter amber <br /> ' bottle without preservative <br /> Following sample collection, each preserved sample was logged on a chain-of-custody form, placed <br /> in a chilled container and transported to a California Department of Health Services (DHS)-certified <br /> laboratory for analysis for <br /> ' • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline and diesel (TPH-g and TPH-d, <br /> respectively)by EPA Method 5030/8015M, <br /> ' • Volatile aromatic compounds including benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylene (BTEX) <br /> and methyl-tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) by EPA Method 8020, and <br /> • Volatile organic compounds including methanol, ethanol, ethylene dibromide (EDB) <br /> ' 1,2-dichloroethane(1,2-DCA), tertiary butanol (TBA), di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tert <br /> butyl ether (ETBE), tert amyl methyl ether(TAME), and confirmation of MTBE by EPA <br /> Method 8260 <br /> ftdvanrcd(.eoFmiron menta! Int <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.