My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006841
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
420
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0537485
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006841
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2020 7:00:21 PM
Creation date
7/27/2020 3:38:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006841
RECORD_ID
PR0537485
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0021568
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER RAINWATER CAR WASH
STREET_NUMBER
420
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
21931206
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
420 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
242
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ir <br /> ' 07 June 2002 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 97-0333 <br /> ' Page 6 of 9 <br /> ' 16 15 and 16 31 feet above mean sea level (Figure 3) Ground water elevation at the site increased <br /> by an average of 2 37 feet between the December 2001 and the February 2002 ground water <br /> monitoring events Ground water flow direction for the area bound by wells MW-1 through MW-6 <br /> ' indicated that local ground water flow direction was radially inward towards the area of wells EW-1, <br /> MW-2 and MW-6 at an approximate gradient of 0 003 ft/ft or less,or approximately 16 feet per mile <br /> 3 4 2 LABORATORY RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> ' A total of six ground water samples were submitted to Castle Analytical Laboratory (CAL), a <br /> DHS-certified laboratory, in February 2002 The laboratory analysis detected TPH-g in water <br /> samples collected from wells MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, MW-4 and MW-6 at concentrations as high <br /> ' as 110,000 /,z g/1 <br /> BTEX constituents were detected at wells MW-2, MW-4 and MW-6 at concentrations as high as <br /> ' 5,100 µgll xylenes The greatest benzene concentrations were detected from well MW-2 at a <br /> C concentration of 1,600µg/1 <br /> 10 MTBE was detected by EPA Method 8020 in the water samples from MW-1 through MW-4 and <br /> MW-6 at concentrations as high as 150,000 4gll (MW-2), MTBE was detected from MW-1,MW-2, <br /> MW-3 and MW-6 utilizing EPA Method 8260 Modified at concentrations as high as 150,000µg/1 <br /> (MW-2) <br /> ' Utilizing EPA Method 8260 Modified, TAME was detected in sample MW-1 at a concentration of <br /> 5 2 ,ug/l, PCE was detected from MW-4 at a concentration of 860,ug/l, and 1,3,5-tnmethylbenzene <br /> r and 1,2,4-tnmethylbenzene were detected from wells MW-2 and MW-6 at concentrations as high <br /> as 1,300µg/1 <br /> No other fuel components or volatile organic compounds (VOCs)were detected above the respected <br /> laboratory reporting limits Previous and current analytical results of ground water monitoring well <br /> samples are summarized in Tables 6 and 7 The laboratory reports (Castle Analytical Laboratory <br /> Reference No 4454, McCampbell Analytical Inc Lab I D 0203005) and chain-of-custody forms <br /> are presented in Appendix E <br /> 4.0. SUMMARY ANIS CONCLUSIONS <br /> The implications from the February 2002 ground water monitoring event are as follows <br /> Advanced Gen Enwronmental,Inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.