Laserfiche WebLink
r ` <br /> 1 06 December 2002 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 97-0333 <br /> ' a Page 4 of 9 <br /> Utilizing a Blue-White Industries F-2000'flow meter, total flow (totalizer) was recorded between <br /> ' 06 June and 26 September 2002(Table 1) During this time,the pump-and-treat interim remediation <br /> system was in operation for approximately 76 days Based on 240,109 gallons of water recorded <br /> during this time, AGE estimated that an average 3,159 gallons of water was discharged per day <br /> ' during this time <br /> 2 6 , MASS-VOLUME REMOVAL CALCULATIONS 1 <br /> Between 06 June and 26 September 2002, an estimated 19 6 pounds of MTBE was extracted from ' <br /> ' ground water (Table 1), since the system was initiated on 21 January 2002, a total mass of <br /> 166 4 pounds of MTBE has been removed The June to August and August to September 2002 mass- <br /> ' volume'calculatlons of MTBE-impacted ground water extracted from the ground water pump-and- <br /> treat system are presented In Appendix C Plots of cumulative ground water pu ' 'and treat mass <br /> removal trends and influent ground water MTBE concentrations versus time are In Appendix D <br />� 1 <br /> I ` <br /> 3.0. GROUND WATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING <br /> On 16 August 2002, ground water monitoring was performed at the site on,wells MW-1 through , <br /> MW-6, as-built monitoring well construction details are summarized In Table 3 Ground water <br /> ' monitoring procedures for the site were outlined In the AGE-prepared Work Plan Addendum - I, j <br /> August 1999, dated 10 August 1999 and approved by the San Joaquin County Environmental Health <br /> Department (EHD) by letter dated 25,August 1999 <br /> ' 3 1 WELL MONITORING AND EVACUATION „ <br /> Depth kto ground water was measured in each well from the top of the well casing to the nearest <br /> ' 0 01-foot utilizing a,Solmst water level` meter The ground water elevation in each well was <br /> I calculated by subtracting the measured depth to ground water from the surveyed casing elevation <br /> (Table 4) Groundwater elevations were plotted and contoured on a scaled site map (Figure 3) , <br /> After water levels were measured, approximately 4 to 111 gallons of ground water (a minimum of <br /> three casing water-volumes per well) were evacuated (purged) from wells MW-1 through MW-6 <br /> utilizing polyethylene disposable bailers Temperature, pH and conductivity were measured for <br /> stabilization at regular purge-volume intervals from wells MW-1 , MW-3, MW-4 and MW-5 using <br /> an Oakton water analyzer, however, data from wells MW-2 and MW-6 was not monitored for <br /> ' ,P stabilization because of the presence of approximately 4 to,5 Inches of floating product In these <br /> Advahced CeoEnvlronmental,Inc I' <br /> I <br />