Laserfiche WebLink
f <br />, <br /> ' L 1 <br /> f t <br /> r <br /> 15 October 2002 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 97-0333 <br /> Page 4 of 8 <br /> ' 2 6 MASS-VOLUME REMOVAL CALCULATIONS <br /> , <br /> Between'OlApnl and 06 June 2002,an estimated 33 85 pounds of MTBE was extracted from ground <br /> ' water(Table 1), since the system was initiated on 21 January 2002, a total mass of 146 77 pounds <br /> of MTBE has been, removed April, May and June 2002 mass-volume calculations of MTBE- <br /> impacted ground water extracted from the ground water pump-and-treat system are presented in <br /> Appendix B Plots of cumulative ground water pump and treat mass removal trends and influent <br /> ground water MTBE concentrations versus time are in Appendix C <br /> r <br /> I 3.4: GROUND WATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING <br /> I ' On 29'May 2002, ground water monitoring was performed at the site on wells MW-1 through <br /> MW-6, as-built monitoring well constriction details are summarized in Table 4 Ground water <br /> monitoring procedures for the site were outlined in the AGE-prepared Work Plan Addendum - <br /> ' August 1999, dated 10 August 1999 and approved by the San Joaquin County Environmental Health <br /> Department (EHD)by letter dated 25 August 1999 <br /> 3 1 WELL MONITORING AND EVACUATION <br /> Depth'to ground water was measured in each well from the top of the well casing to the nearest <br /> 0 01-foot utilizing a Solinst water level meter The ground water elevation in each well was <br /> calculated by subtracting the measured depth to ground water from the surveyed casing elevation <br /> ' I I (Table 5) Ground water elevations were plotted and contoured on a scaled site map (Figure 3) <br /> ! After water'levels were measured, approximately,7 gallons of ground water,(a minimum of three I' <br /> i ' i casing ,water-volumes per well) were evacuated (purged) from wells MW-I through MW-5 and <br /> 13 gallons-of water were evacuated'from'well MW-6 utilizing'polyethylene disposable bailers 'I <br /> ' Temperature,pH and conductivity were measured for stabilization at regular purge-volume intervals <br /> from each well using an Oakton water analyzer Copies of field data and logs are in Appendix D <br /> Purged ground water Was contamenzed in 5 5-gallon drums and was stored'on-site in an area lacking <br /> general public access , ! <br /> 3 2 GROUND WATER SAMPLING <br /> ' I I <br /> Following well purging, ground water levels in the monitoring wells were allowed to achieve a <br /> I minimum of 80 percent recharge prior to sample collection Ground water samples were collected <br /> from,each of the purged wells'utilising new, disposable polyethylene bailers and transferred into <br /> r , <br /> r <br /> I I ! I f 1 Advanced GeoEnvrronmental,IncII <br /> II'I <br /> ` <br /> V II' I <br /> I <br /> !, { <br />