My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
2516
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0540433
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2020 6:13:09 PM
Creation date
7/27/2020 4:08:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0540433
PE
2953
FACILITY_ID
FA0023104
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER MANTECA POLICE FIRING RANGE
STREET_NUMBER
2516
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95337
APN
24131044
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2516 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Page 1 of 2 <br /> Nuel Henderson [EH] <br /> From: Rick Day [day@geoconine.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2015 4:42 PM <br /> To: Nuel Henderson [EH] <br /> Cc: 'Nabaz Saieed (nabaz.saieed@tylin.com)'; FEZ(proj.320156@tylin.com) <br /> Subject: RE: Manteca Firing Range Question <br /> Attachments: image001.jpg <br /> Hi, Nuel. <br /> As lead concentrations increased,the XRF readings were lower than their corresponding total lead data with the <br /> differences between the two generally increasing with higher total lead results. I don't think there is any doubt <br /> that the berm and center of the range floor have very high lead concentrations, based on both the XRF reading <br /> and the total lead results. <br /> With this being said,the differences between the XRF readings and total lead data become decrease with the <br /> lower total lead results. <br /> If you go strictly by the equation, an XRF reading of-5 mg/kg would result in a predicted total lead <br /> concentration of 50 mg/kg and-15 mg/kg would result in a predicted total lead concentration of 135 mg/kg. <br /> However, at background sample locations BG4, BG8, and BG12,the XRF readings were higher than the total lead <br /> results (i.e.,the reason I did not use the equation to establish the lines on Figure 3). <br /> Accordingly, I used the XRF readings less than 50 mg/kg and the total lead results to estimate the STLC>5 mg/I <br /> (i.e., 50 mg/kg)and TCLP>5 mg/l (i.e., 135 mg/kg) dashed lines shown on Figure 3.The lines are dashed to <br /> indicate that the limits are approximate. <br /> With any type of remediation, I would recommend confirmation sampling during or after the remedial effort to <br /> confirm that the horizontal and vertical extents are defined. <br /> Hope this helps-let me know if you have further questions. <br /> Thanks, <br /> Rick. <br /> Richard Day, CEG, CHG I Principal/Senior Geologist <br /> GEOCON CONSULTANTS, INC. <br /> 6671 Brisa Street, Livermore, California 94550 <br /> P 1925.371.5900 ext. 401 M1925.872.5860 <br /> dav@seoconinc.com / www.eeoconinc.com / Facebook / Linkedin <br /> Bay Area - Sacramento - Fairfield - Los Angeles - Orange County - Riverside <br /> County - Palm Desert - San Diego <br /> Geotechnical Eneineerine Environmental Services Engineerine Geoloev Construction <br /> 12/16/2015 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.