Laserfiche WebLink
cealagwd Tech acs Inc Page 4 <br /> GW Monitoring Report <br /> Ted Peters-AST <br /> Project No 7012 <br /> May 15, 2003 <br /> The wells were then purged of at least 3 well volumes of stagnant water using a centrifugal <br /> pump Purging continued until the temperature, conductivity and pH of the groundwater <br /> had stabilized (<10% variation among three readings) indicating that formation water <br /> representative of aquifer conditions was entering the well These water quality parameters <br /> were measured at intervals of each well volume purged The logs are included in Appendix <br /> ' C <br /> A stainless steel bailer or dedicated Wattera tubing was used to collect a sample from each <br /> ' well Care was taken to minimize sample agitation from the initial filling of the bailer to the <br /> transfer of the sample to the VOA vial and glass amber liter bottles Once the sample <br /> container was filled and capped, the bottle was then inverted, tapped and checked for <br /> ' headspace bubbles The sample container was then identified and labeled with a unique <br /> designation, inserted into foam holders and placed in an ice chest cooled to 4°C for <br /> transport to the laboratory <br /> ' All non-disposable sampling equipment was decontaminated using a steam cleaner before <br /> and between uses Disposable gloves were used by the technician to collect all samples and <br /> were changed after each sample was collected <br /> ' A chain of custody document, listing all samples collected, accompanied the samples from <br /> field to laboratory, thereby providing; a means to track their movement and ensure their <br /> integrity <br /> All water purged from each monitoring well was placed in a 55 gallon DOT approved <br /> container, properly labeled and stored on site <br /> ' 23 Groundwater Sample Analyses <br /> The groundwater samples collected on April 2, 2003, were delivered to Sherwood Labs <br /> ' (Department of Health Services Certification No 1400) of Hilmar, California, for analysis <br /> The groundwater samples were analyzed for <br /> • Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl Benzene and Xylene (BTEX) by EPA method 602 <br /> • Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Gasoline (TPH-G) by EPA method 5030/8015(M) <br /> ' • TEPH-D by EPA method 8015M <br /> Sherwood forwarded samples to Entech Analytical Labs Inc (Department of Health <br /> Services Certification No 2346) of Santa Claia, California, for analysis of <br /> ' . Volatile Organic Compounds by EPA method 8260B (except MW-8) <br /> Dissolved lead, gasoline oxygenates (MTBE, DIPE, ETRE, TAME, TBA), methanol & <br /> ' ethanol were not analyzed They were all non-detect for the March 2002 event and omitted <br /> in accordance with the MRP <br /> ' A Chain of Custody was completed for all samples collected and tracked to ensure sample <br /> integrity The results and the detection limits for these analyses are listed in Table 2 of <br /> Appendix A, while the lab analytical results are presented in Appendix B <br />