Laserfiche WebLink
xanagement Nemo 99-9 (Ra J) <br /> Page 2 <br /> affected facilities , in one rulamaking, of their responsibilities under <br /> law, rather than by issuing individual permits facility by facility. <br /> The Department focus will shift from the pre-audit of permit <br /> applications to the imposition of industry-specific performance <br /> standards and subsequent emphasis on inspections and enforcement <br /> efforts. <br /> The Department plans to address non-RCRA regulated treatment activities <br /> requiring State authorization through the PDR process, except fort <br /> o incinerators (other than non-RCRA regulated incinerators used <br /> solely for treatment of fuel contaminated soils) <br /> o waste oil recycling facilities <br /> o activities involving land application of hazardous waste <br /> (this includes landfills, land treatment, surface <br /> impoundment&, injection wells and waste piles, other than <br /> non-RCRA regulated waste piles for treatment of soils <br /> contaminated with fuels, metals, or solvents) <br /> o treatment of reactive or extremely hazardous waste <br /> in addition to treatment activities, transporters handling only used <br /> oil by transferring from one container or tank to another, pumping, <br /> Packaging, and/or storing at a transfer station/facility for less than <br /> 144 hours will be addressed under PBA. All other transfer <br /> stations/facilities must comply with Management Nemo 90-9. On-site <br /> storage of spent dry cleaning wastes will also be addressed under PBR. <br /> This management memo applies only to those activities described in the <br /> preceding two paragraphs as planned for inclusion under PDR. <br /> The Department believes that the PBR approach will decrease duplication <br /> of efforts, is ,the pest use of limited resources, and will provide <br /> statewide consistendj . In doing ■o, the PBR approach will allow <br /> permitting staff time to be available for those facilities with waste <br /> streams and processes which have the greatest potential for detrimental <br /> impact to public health and the environment if improperly managed. <br /> The Department anticipates adoption of the on-site Fixed Treatment Unit <br /> PBR regulation by the fall of 1991, and will request an effective date <br /> of January 1, 1992. This delayed effective data is being requested so <br /> that the effective date of the regulations will eerresand to the <br /> effective date of pendina legislation which would have a large impact <br /> on the PBR program. <br /> The applicabilif•y of. the PBR approach to off-site facilities is more <br /> complex and limited , and the regulation of these until any PBR <br /> rulemaking for these facilities is completed creates problems in terms <br /> of enforcement mod otzrating equity. <br />