Laserfiche WebLink
I Attorney of Riverside County; Anne Marie Schubert,District Attorney of Sacramento County; <br /> 2 Michael A. Ramos,District Attorney of San Bernardino County; Mara W.Elliott, City Attorney of <br /> 3 San Diego City; Summer Stephan,District Attorney of San Diego County; George Gasc6n,District <br /> 4 Attorney of San Francisco County;Tori Verber Salazar,District Attorney of San Joaquin County; <br /> 5 Dan Dow,District Attorney of San Luis Obispo County; Stephen M.Wagstaffe,District Attorney of <br /> 6 San Mateo County;Joyce Dudley,District Attorney of Santa Barbara County; Jeffrey F. Rosen, <br /> 7 District Attorney of Santa Clara County; Stephanie A. Bridgett,District Attorney of Shasta County; <br /> 8 Krishna A. Abrams,District Attorney of Solano County; Jill Ravitch,District Attorney of Sonoma <br /> 9 County; Birgit A. Fladager,District Attorney of Stanislaus County;Amanda L. Hopper,District <br /> 10 Attorney of Sutter County; Tim Ward,District Attorney of Tulare County; Gregory D.Totten, <br /> 11 District Attorney of Ventura County; and Jeff W. Reisig,District Attorney of Yolo County <br /> 12 (collectively,"the People"); and Defendants SMART&FINAL STORES LLC, and CASH& <br /> 13 CARRY STORES LLC,generally appearing through their attorneys,Munger, Tolles&Olson,LLP, <br /> 14 by Patrick J. Cafferty,Jr.,hereby stipulate and agree to this Final Judgment and Permanent <br /> 15 Injunction and the following Final Judgment may be entered by the Court in the above entitled <br /> 16 matter. <br /> 17 NOW THEREFORE,the People and Defendants(collectively,the"Parties")having <br /> 18 requested that this Court enter this Final Judgment,and the Court having considered the Final <br /> 19 Judgment reached between the Parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED,ADJUDGED,AND DECREED <br /> 20 as follows: <br /> 21 1. JURISDICTION <br /> 22 This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the matters alleged in this action and personal <br /> 23 jurisdiction over the Parties to this Final Judgment. <br /> 24 2. SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTED CLAIMS <br /> 25 This Final Judgment is neither an admission nor denial by any Defendant regarding any issue <br /> 26 of law or fact in the above-captioned matter or any violation of law. All Parties have agreed that this <br /> 27 Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction is a fair and reasonable resolution of the matters alleged in <br /> 28 the Complaint, and that this Judgment is in the best interest of the public. All Parties have stipulated <br /> -2- <br /> STIPULATION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION <br />