Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> Orenco Systems Inc. March 2002 <br /> �' AdvanTex AXI 0 Test Report <br /> r <br /> L <br /> TABLE OF CONTENTS <br /> LW <br /> EXECUTIVESUMMARY....................................................................... ............. <br /> CERTIFICATION.......................................................................................... <br /> TABLEOF CONTENTS..................................................................................................4 <br /> ' 1. INTRODUCTION <br /> 2. ADVANTEXTM -AX10 TEST...............................................................................10 <br /> 2.1 Plant Start-up and Loading .................................................................................. 10 <br /> 2.2 Plant Loading........................................................................................................ 10 <br /> ► 2.3 Stress Testing........................................................................................................ 11 <br /> L2.4 Colour, Odour, Oil and Foam............................................................................... 11 <br /> 2.4.1 Colour....................................................................................................... 11 <br /> 2.4.2 Odour........................................................................................................ 12 <br /> 2.5 Test Unit Changes................................................................................................. 13 <br /> 2.5.1 Pipe Replacement...................................................................................... 13 <br /> Lo 2.5.2 Filter Manifold Replacement.................................................................... 13 <br /> 2.5.3 Increasing the Recirculation Ratio & Media Wetting Frequency............. 14 <br /> 2.5.4 Summary................................................................................................... 14 <br /> V, 2.6 Flow Reduction..................................................................................................... 14 <br /> 3. RESULTS...........................................................................................................15 <br /> 3.1 Parameters Monitored........................................................................................... 15 <br /> 3.1.1. Daily Dosage Volume.................................. <br /> 3.1.2 Temperature.............................................................................................. 15 <br /> !L 3.1.3 pH.............................................................................................................. 16 <br /> 3.1.4 TSS............................................................................................................ 17 <br /> ' 3.1.5 CBODS ..................................................................................................... 18 <br /> L. 3.1.6 Turbidity................................................................................................... 19 <br /> 3.2 Stress Testing........................................................................................................ 20 <br /> 3.3 Colour, Odour, Oil and Foam............................................................................... 20 <br /> 3.3.1 CoIour....................................................................................................... 20 <br /> 3.3.2 Odour........................................................................................................20 <br /> L3.3.3 Oily Film And Foam................................................................................. 20 <br /> r <br /> 4. DISCUSSION .....................................................................................................21 <br /> 4.1 CBOD Removal Efficiency ..................................................................................21 <br /> 4.2 Relationship Between Effluent CBOD, Effluent TSS & Effluent Turbidity........ 22 <br /> 4.3 Impact Of Manifold Replacement......................................................................... 24 <br /> L" 4.4 Effect of Increased Filter Dosing Frequency ....................24 <br /> .................................... <br /> R 4.5 Comparison With Davis Test Unit And NSF AX20 Results................................ 25 <br /> L <br /> NovaTec Consultants Inc_ Page 4 of 38 <br /> L <br />