My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
C
>
CHRISMAN
>
23833
>
4200 – Liquid Waste Program
>
PR0516930
>
COMPLIANCE INFO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2020 9:22:11 AM
Creation date
8/5/2020 10:01:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4200 – Liquid Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
RECORD_ID
PR0516930
PE
4242
FACILITY_ID
FA0012932
FACILITY_NAME
NAVARRA BROS
STREET_NUMBER
23833
STREET_NAME
CHRISMAN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95304
APN
25014014
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
23833 CHRISMAN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\4200 - Liquid Waste\C\CHRISMAN\23833\PR0516930\INSPECT CORRESPOND.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 <br /> evaluation (median of 6.7),within the 45 40 9 range required by'ANSI/NSF Standard 40. The pH data for the <br /> evaluation are shown in Appendix C. <br /> 3.5 Temperature <br /> Influent temperatures over the evaluation period ranged.from..13 to.23°.0 (median,of 200C). Aeration <br /> chamber temperatures ranged from 16 to 22°C:(median of 20°C) The temperature data are shown in <br /> Appendix C. <br /> 3.6 Dissolved Oxygen <br /> Dissolved oxygen (DO) was measured in the aeration chamber and effluent during.the evaluation. The <br /> :aeration chamber DO ranged between 1.2 and 9.2 mglL(median of 4.4 mg/L),while the effluent DO ranged <br /> between 1.0 and 6.9 mglL (median of 4.6 mg/L). All dissolved'oxygen data are shown in"Appendix C. <br /> 3.7 Color, Threshold Odor,'Cily Film, Foam <br /> Three samples of the effluent were analyzed for color, odot, oily film and foam as prescribed in NSF <br /> Standard 40. The effluent was acceptable according to the requirements in NSF Standard 40, with color: <br /> less than 15 units, non-offensive threshold odor, no visible evidence'of oVi fiTm-and no foam. <br /> 3.8 Noise <br /> A reading of the noise level at a distance of 20feet from the plant was'taken while the plant was in <br /> operation, using a hand-held decibel meter. The reading was below the 60 dbA required under ANSI/NSF <br /> Standard 40. <br /> 4.0 REFERENCES <br /> 1. "Environmental Protection Agency Guidelines for Secondary Treatment"; Federal Register,Volume 28,, <br /> No. 159, 1973, <br /> 2. Grady, Jr., C.P., and H.C. Lim, Biological Wastewater Treatment- Theory and Annlihations, Marcel <br /> Dekker Publishers, New York, 1980. <br /> 3. APHA,AWWA,WPCF, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewa CIL 17th Edition. <br /> American Public HealthAssociat`ion, Washington, D.C. <br /> 4. U.S. EPA, Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, <br /> Washington, D.C. <br /> 981.1ti1201. 6(1 This repo4.may not be reproduced In whole or in part° F5je 16 of 49 <br /> Final Report wittwut tlis expresmod written consent of NSF lntematlonal,^ April 2000 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.