Laserfiche WebLink
ORDER NO.R5-2003-0099 2 <br /> INFORMATION SHEET <br /> NEWPORT PACIFIC CAPITAL COMPANY <br /> ARBOR MOBILE HOME PARK WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILTY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> events that characterized the supply water and the treated wastewater. TDS concentrations of 350 <br /> mg/L and 380 mg/L were reported in the treated wastewater. <br /> Although there is no reliable groundwater quality information at this time, it is anticipated that <br /> continued discharge below the effluent limitation would be protective of the groundwater quality <br /> because some attenuation is anticipated in the unsaturated zone and a portion of the TDS may consist <br /> of biodegradable dissolved solids. Therefore, the discharge of wastewater with moderate increases of <br /> TDS in treated wastewater is acceptable <br /> Total Suspended Solids <br /> TSS was included as an effluent limitation because the site has historically discharged wastewater with <br /> elevated concentrations of TSS, which resulted in plugging the seepage pits. The reduced permeability <br /> of the seepage pits resulted in inadequate disposal capacity and spills of wastewater to the ground <br /> surface. By limiting the TSS concentration to the seepage pits, it is expected that disposal capacity can <br /> be maintained. <br /> The limit was set at 40 mg/L (monthly average) and 80 mg/L (daily maximum)because the Discharger <br /> demonstrated that effluent quality could be reliably achieved as reported in the RWD. It is anticipated <br /> that continued discharge below the effluent limitation would be protective of the seepage pit <br /> infiltration capacity. <br /> Biochemical Oxygen Demand <br /> BOD was included as an effluent limitation for the same reason as TSS. Discharge of excessive BOD <br /> will result in plugged seepage pits and inadequate capacity. <br /> The limit was set at 40 mg/L (monthly average) and 80 mg/L (daily maximum)because the Discharger <br /> demonstrated that effluent quality could be reliably achieved as reported in the RWD. It is anticipated <br /> that continued discharge below the effluent limitation would be protective of the seepage pit <br /> infiltration capacity. <br /> Antidegradation <br /> The antidegradation directives of Section 13000 of the California Water Code require that waters of <br /> the State that are better in quality than established water quality objectives be maintained"consistent <br /> with the maximum benefit to the people of the State." Waters can be of high quality for some <br /> constituents or beneficial uses and not others. Policies and procedures for complying with this <br /> directive are set forth in the Basin Plan(including by reference State Water Board Resolution No. 68- <br /> 16, "Statement of Policy With Respect to Maintaining High Quality Waters in California," or <br /> "Antidegradation"Policy). <br /> Resolution 68-16 is applied on a case-by-case, constituent-by-constituent basis in determining whether <br /> a certain degree of degradation can be justified. It is incumbent upon the Discharger to provide <br /> technical information for the Regional Board to evaluate that fully characterizes: <br /> ❑ All waste constituents to be discharged; <br />