My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006637
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
1012
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545948
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006637
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2020 10:29:01 PM
Creation date
8/5/2020 4:05:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006637
RECORD_ID
PR0545948
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005159
FACILITY_NAME
FILL-EM FAST
STREET_NUMBER
1012
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
21903024
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1012 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' r <br /> • The minimum purge volume was calculated to be three tunes the total well volume Once the <br /> minimum purge volume has been calculated purging was started Purging was conducted using either <br /> a centrifugal pump connected to a dedicated Watters tube, a 2-inch diameter submersible pump, a <br /> bladder pump, or a disposable polyethylene bailer The type of equipment used to purge the well was <br /> selected based on depth to water, the anticipated purge rate, and the amount of sediment expected to <br /> be contained in the well, and was recorded on the Groundwater Sample Collection Record <br /> Temperature, pH, and specific conductance of the purge water was monitored dunng the purging <br /> process at regular intervals Purging was ceased when the monitored parameters stabilized (three <br /> consecutive readings not varying by more than 10-percent)and a minimum of three well volumes had <br /> been purged <br /> In the event a well dried out during purging, the well was allowed to recover to 80-percent of <br /> it's onguzal well volume, or for 24-hours, whichever was less, pnor to collecting a groundwater <br /> sample <br /> Groundwater Monitonag Well Sampling <br /> Once the well was successfully purged a groundwater sample was collected using a <br /> disposable polyethylene bailer connected to clean nylon or polyethylene cord The bailer was lowered <br /> slowly into the water to avoid agitation of the sample A portion of the sample was placed in a <br /> container and the monitoring parameters were recorded The remaining portion of the sample was <br /> . transferred from the bailer to the appropriate, laboratory supplied sampling bottles, using a bottom <br /> emptying device The sampling containers were Filed completely, leaving a positive meniscus, so no <br /> airspace remained in the veal after sealing <br /> The sample bottles were labeled with the well identification (n a MW-1, MW-2, etc), date <br /> and time of the sample collection, the field technicians initials,job number, analyses to be performed, <br /> J � Y P ed, <br /> and other relevant information Samples were immediatelylaced in an insulated cooler containing <br /> g <br /> crushed ice The samples were maintained at approximately 3 to 4°C until reaching the analytical <br /> laboratory <br /> I , <br /> Laboratory Analysis <br /> Samples were shipped, under appropriate chain-of-custody procedures, to Southern <br /> Petroleum Laboratory in Houston, Texas (SPL) SPL Laboratory is certified by the State of <br /> California Department of Toxic Substance Control for performing the requested analyses Samples <br /> were shipped via Federal Express to minimize the time the samples remained in the cooler Samples <br /> were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg), and benzene, toluene, <br /> ethylbenzene, and xylene isomers (BTEX), following Environmental Protection Agency Methods <br /> 5030, 8015 modified,'and 8020 Samples were analyzed on a standard two week turn-around time <br /> I <br /> r ' <br /> ',II <br /> �r <br /> I ` <br /> I I q I,� ,i , IE it Ij ' <br /> I i Mil I ill It,! U I I!I`II I I I I ' I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.