My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006641
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
1012
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545948
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006641
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/29/2020 10:21:30 PM
Creation date
8/5/2020 4:09:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006641
RECORD_ID
PR0545948
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005159
FACILITY_NAME
FILL-EM FAST
STREET_NUMBER
1012
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
21903024
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1012 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The minimum purge volume was calculated to be three times the total well volume <br /> Once the minimum purge volume has been calculated purging was started. Purging was <br /> conducted using either a centrifugal pump connected to a dedicated Watters tube, a 2-inch <br /> diameter submersible pump, a bladder pump, or a disposable polyethylene bailer. The type <br /> of equipment used to purge the well was selected based on depth to water, the anticipated <br /> purge rate, and the amount of sediment expected to be contained in the well, and was recorded <br /> on the Groundwater Sample Collection Record Temperature, pH, and specific conductance <br /> of the purge water was monitored during the purging process at regular intervals Purging was <br /> ceased when the monitored parameters stabilized (three consecutive readings not varying by <br /> more than 10-percent) and a minimum of three well volumes had been purged <br /> In the event a well dried out during purging, the well was allowed to recover to <br /> 80-percent of it's original well volume, or for 24-hours, whichever was less, prior to collecting <br /> a groundwater sample. <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Well Sampling <br /> Once the well was successfully purged a groundwater sample was collected using a <br /> disposable polyethylene bailer connected to clean nylon or polyethylene cord. The bailer was <br /> lowered slowly into the water to avoid agitation of the sample. A portion of the sample was <br /> placed in a container and the monitoring parameters were recorded. The remaining portion <br /> of the sample was transferred from the bailer to the appropriate, laboratory supplied sampling <br /> bottles, using a bottom emptying device. The sampling containers were filled completely, <br /> leaving a positive meniscus, so no airspace remained in the vial after sealing. <br /> The sample bottles were labeled with the well identification (i.e MW-1, MW-2, etc), <br /> date and time of the sample collection, the field technicians initials, ,lob number, analyses to <br /> be performed, and other relevant information. Samples were immediately placed in an <br /> insulated cooler containing: crushed ice The samples were maintained at approximately 3 to <br /> 4°C until reaching the analytical laboratory. <br /> Laboratory Analysis <br /> Samples were shipped, under appropriate chain-of-custody procedures, to Southern <br /> Petroleum Laboratory in Houston, Texas (SPL). SPL Laboratory is certified by the State of <br /> California Department of Toxic Substance Control for performing the requested analyses <br /> Samples were shipped via Federal Express to minimize the time the samples remained in the <br /> cooler. Samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg), and <br /> benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene isomers (BTEX), following Environmental <br /> Protection Agency Methods 5030, 8015 modified, and 8020. Samples were analyzed on a <br /> standard two week turn-around time. <br /> , II <br /> I ; I <br /> I <br /> r V , <br /> h I I I' I I II <br /> I t <br /> it I I <br /> t Ili� I e I il�' II'� VIII I' <br /> It I� I II° 'III II I it II' I I Il II ISI' II'II' I I "� II I , II{I, I I Iii l II 'I I I ,I ,Ifi I I I II'I t I l l t I 'f <br /> I h � I I I 1111, I I I I III I I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.