Laserfiche WebLink
I ' <br /> 54 Msical Contaim-rimt or Chemical Neutralization <br /> The remedial actions of physical containment or chemical neutralization are not viable alternatives <br /> in this case due to high costs and the availability of other proven, more viable techniques <br /> 6.0 CONCL USIONS <br />' The data generated from the environmental investigations conducted by both Canome and SEA COR <br /> have adequately characterized the water quality of the shallow aquifer beneath the site and the extent <br />' and magnitude of soil impacted with petroleum hydrocarbons To date, no hydrocarbon constituents <br /> above State or Federal action levels have been detected in water samples collected from the <br />' groundwater momtor wells at the site Based on this information, SEACOR does not recommend <br /> any remedial measures for the site groundwater The soil however,has been impacted by petroleum <br />' hydrocarbons at levels that combined with the depth to groundwater will require remediation <br /> The evaluation ofP roven, available remediation approaches and the vapor extraction pilot testing <br />' performed by Canome suggests that soil vapor extraction would be an effective technology to <br /> remediate the soil impacted with petroleum hydrocarbons at the site Further evaluation of mass <br /> removal rates and anticipated hydrocarbon concentrations for extended remedial system operation <br />' will be resented in the final remedial plan for the site The information will be used to specify the <br /> P P P �' <br />' type of equipment recommended to extract and treat the hydrocarbon vapors prior to disharge to the <br /> atmosphere <br /> I <br /> TOC1434 PAR 1 SP.ACOR° <br /> M0005-002-01 +� May 31 1994 <br /> I <br />