Laserfiche WebLink
• Notes to Table 5 <br /> 1 Elevations are based on temporary benchmark that has an elevation of 25 99 ft The benchmark is a center- <br /> punched bold in a light base about 22 ft east of the centerline of the railroad tracks which cross West Yosemite <br /> Avenue Benchmarks of record within one mile of site were found demolished <br /> 2 TOC=Top of casing Elevations of top of road boxes are 25 52 for MW-1,25 43 for MW-2 and 25 66 for MW-3 <br /> RESULTS—CHEMICAL ANALYSES <br /> The results of the chemical analyses of the groundwater samples collected on March 19, 1999 from the <br /> three monitoring wells on the site, MW-1,MW-2 and MW-3 (see Table 6 below), are consistent with, and <br /> confirm those of the samples collected from the same wells August 24, 1998 That is, the concentrations <br /> of TPH-D, benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, xylenes, MTBE and Total Lead are all below the analytical <br /> method detection limits for the samples from all three wells <br /> Table 6. Petroleum hydrocarbon parameter concentrations in groundwater samples from <br /> monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-3, collected March 19, 1999. <br /> Monitoring TPH-D Benzene Ethylbenzene Toluene Xylenes MTBE Total Lead <br /> Well No (pg/1) (pg/1) Gig/l) (µg/1) (11g/1) (110) (m1/4 <br /> MW-1 < < < < < < < <br /> MW-2 < < < < < < < <br /> MW-3 < < < < < < < <br /> Method 50 0 5 0 5 0 5 05 0 5 0 1 <br /> Detection <br /> Limit <br />• RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> CAL INC recommends that ABF Freight Systems, Inc apply to the San Joaquin County Public Health <br /> Services Environmental Health Division for closure of their underground storage removal stte at 2427 <br /> West Yosemite Avenue, Manteca, California The recommendation is based on the fact that analyses of <br /> two sets of groundwater samples collected 7 months apart from the three monitoring wells at the site <br /> failed to detect any concentrations of the petroleum hydrocarbon parameters analyzed This suggests that <br /> the diesel fuel contamination detected in the soil removed from the UST excavation was very localized <br /> and did not reach the groundwater table --tV4+J 5,3 8f"^ Jnr 3 j li 117,r�.►��� <br /> Well Destruction Plan <br /> CAL INC also recommends that ABF Freight Systems apply to the County of San Joaquin Environmental <br /> Health Division for a permit for the destruction of the three monitoring wells The purpose of the well <br /> destruction is to ensure that the quality of the groundwater is protected Destruction of the well eliminates <br /> the pathway that any surface contamination could potentially follow between the surface and the <br /> groundwater table The following well destruction plan is recommended It is based on the requirements <br /> in Bulletin 74-81, "Water Well Standards State of California", by the Department of Water Resources, <br /> December 1981, and its supplement, Bulletin 74-90, "California Well Standards" by the California <br /> Department of Water Resource, June 1991 The well destruction will be accomplished by filling and <br /> sealing them by pressure grouting <br /> The well destruction plan includes the following tasks <br />. • Sounding the wells just before destruction to insure there are no obstructions in the well casings that <br /> will interfere with filling and sealing Any obstructions will be removed <br />