Laserfiche WebLink
g� 1 <br /> Manteca is waiting for the area to be developed, and as a condition of that development, the City <br /> of Manteca will require the line to be connected by the developers from the Crom and Airport <br /> Street intersection to the line ending at 100 feet from the north of Yosemite on Airport, thereby <br /> connecting the entire area of concern to public water. Center Street is also on the agenda to be <br /> connected with North Airport, which will add additional public water in the area, completely <br /> engulfing the"plume" area as well. All of this can be verified by the General Plan and the City <br /> of Manteca. This information has been stated to your agency in past in previous letters and your <br /> agency is aware of it. Basically, the entire area involved herein in the "Plume" area is planned to <br /> be developed, and as a result of said future development, have city water available for the <br /> lots in the area to hook up to public water if they so choose to do so. Conclusively then, it is just <br /> a matter of time wherein the entire area is either now annexed into the city or will be annexed <br /> into the city and city water available. In fact, the corner of northwest Airport and Yosemite <br /> Avenues has already been annexed into the City of Manteca. To continue, as your agency has <br /> proposed, with new"plume" finding,drilling and monitoring additional wells, etc.,will not <br /> result in a long term solution to safe drinking water because the City of Manteca will have solved <br /> it (in all probability) in advance. You should realize that locally the City of Manteca is hurriedly <br /> being developed and the development is accelerated especially in that area. <br /> As time is of the essence to submit Mr. Guinta's submissions with the attachments, other <br /> documents and attachments will be forthcoming and be provided at the hearing. Mr. Guinta will <br /> state good cause to add additional information to your agency for consideration at the hearing. <br /> Mr. Guinta reserves the right to add additional information, testimony, objections, and as <br /> otherwise, for the protection of his rights so that due process is given to him which is his <br /> protected right. In that regard, Mr. Guinta asserts and claims the agencies entire file as <br /> supporting his contention that the current order(s)need to be modified to a realistic cost effective <br /> approach. That financial conditions of the parties, equities in the premises in question, cost of <br /> diminishing returns, and remedial approaches should be pragmatic based upon realities of <br /> both physics and of realistic financial abilities of the parties.. <br /> In summation of Mr. Guinta's written submissions, Mr. Guinta prays this learned and <br /> accomplished agency,that the present orders and conditions need to be modified as outlined <br /> and that an adopted path of consideration of rational cost expenditures based upon clearly <br /> defined balanced expected remedial results should be implemented in its stead, which will result <br /> in a finalization of the matter with all costs paid with further hardship to all parties hereto <br /> mitigated, including the state. <br /> For all of the above reasons I respectfully submit on behalf of Mr. Guinta all of the <br /> foregoing. <br /> Regarlls, <br /> Arthur L. Barnes <br /> 7 <br />