My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_2004-2019
Environmental Health - Public
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
2072
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505553
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_2004-2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/13/2020 2:16:35 PM
Creation date
8/13/2020 12:19:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2004-2019
RECORD_ID
PR0505553
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0006856
FACILITY_NAME
FRANKS FOOD MART
STREET_NUMBER
2072
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
94336
APN
22202001
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2072 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
294
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Y • � <br /> November 27, 2007 C , <br /> James Barton ` r p � r'�., o• 'j <br /> �l� L V til 1 J• V <br /> Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Region <br /> 11020 Sun Center Drive, Suite 200 <br /> Rancho Cordova, CA 95670-6114 <br /> Dear Mr. Barton, <br /> I have received the third quarter test results for the off site water wells. State standards require <br /> the MTBE level to be a maximum of 13 parts per billion (ppb) for health and a maximum of 5 <br /> ppb for taste. These results from URS show that only four wells are out of compliance before <br /> filtration and all of the wells are in compliance after filtration. Three of the four wells are out of <br /> compliance for health and taste, while one is only out of compliance for taste. With this <br /> information and the results from the bacteria testing done by FGL, it would seem that removing <br /> the carbon filters from all of the wells except the three still in question would be the right course <br /> of action. If the wells are within normal compliance levels for health and taste before filtration, <br /> but are still being treated by a carbon filter which could actually breed bacteria, this defeats the <br /> purpose of providing healthy drinking water to those residents. I have attached the third quarter <br /> results from URS. I appreciate all of your time and attention to this matter. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Frank Guinta,Jr. <br /> CC: Lori Okun <br /> David Boyers <br /> Ken Landau <br /> Pamela Creedon <br /> Brian Newman <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.